My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-12-12_REVISION - C1996083 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2008-12-12_REVISION - C1996083 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:38:55 PM
Creation date
12/15/2008 9:35:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
12/12/2008
Doc Name
Responses to DRMS Comments and Concerns
From
J.E. Stover & Associates, Inc
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
PR11
Email Name
JJD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J. E. STOVER & ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />P.O. BOX 60340 <br />GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO 81506 <br />PHONE: (970) 245-4101, FAX 242-7908 <br />MINE ENGINEERING <br />MINE RECLAMATION <br />December 9, 2008 <br />J. J. Dudash <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />_ Re: Bowie No-2 Mine _ _ _ <br />Permit Revision No. 11 <br />Northern Extension of B-Seam Mine Plan <br />Federal Coal Lease Modification <br />Permit C-1996-083 <br />Dear Mr. Dudash: <br />CIVIL ENGINEERING <br />CONST. MANAGEMENT <br />RECEIVED <br />DEC 12 2000 <br />Division of Keoamad0n, <br />--,ning-snd-S9etY - - <br />The DRMS' letter dated December 8, 2008 transmitted its adequacy response for the <br />referenced permit revision. On behalf of Bowie Resources, LLC, "BRL", following are <br />its responses to the DRMS' comments and concerns. <br />Item 6 in the adequacy letter requested an update to the probable hydrologic <br />consequences section of the permit application to include a discussion of the impacts of <br />the operations proposed in PR-11. As per our discussion this date, the mine plan <br />revision does not change the amount of water that can be discharged. Therefore the <br />existing PHC does not change as a result of the mine plan revision in PR-11. <br />BRL has two technical revisions in progress that do amend the PHC section of the <br />permit application. The revisions both anticipate increased mine inflow rates as the <br />mine workings are expanded to the north. TR-54 is a request to discharge 1,000 <br />gallons per minute to the surface. TR-57 is a request to discharge 1,000 gallons per <br />minute to the old U. S. Steel mine. <br />Please call if you have any questions. <br />Sincerely, <br />J. E. Stover, P.E. <br />Consulting Engineer <br />cc: Wm. A. Bear, Jr.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.