My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-03-03_REVISION - M1988112 (21)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
2008-03-03_REVISION - M1988112 (21)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:38:59 PM
Creation date
12/12/2008 1:52:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
3/3/2008
Doc Name
Objectons
From
Town of San Luis
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM3
Email Name
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Objection to BMRI's AM-03 <br />` Page 13 of 23 <br />February 22, 2008 <br />4). There is no analysis as to total dissolved solids in the report. Yet, Scott <br />Mefford's June 2007 report attached as part of Exhibit E was submitted as part of these <br />Opposers objections to the SWSP in June 2007. With knowledge of the issues raised <br />by Mr. Mefford,. one would expect BMRI to have addressed them as part of AM-03. <br />5) The analysis as to manganese assumes that there will be no increased <br />levels in the ground water after the land dispersal. The premise is that soils at the ranch <br />are initially absorbed by the soil oxidized to forrn insoluble manganese oxides, and that <br />soils at the ranch have a virtually unlimited capacity to retain manganese. Due to <br />"multiple soil and pond geochemleal processes that remove manganese from solution", <br />the report contends that no discussion of increased manganese concentrations in the <br />ground water need occur as part of the land dispersal concept. The report states that <br />manganese will initially be controlled by adsorption Into the soil, but is unclear as to <br />what occurs after the initial period. (p. 32) <br />Overall, the implicit assumption-behind the analysis is flawed as it assumes that: <br />(1) there is an entitlement of some sort to steadily Infuse waste water into the aquifer <br />that is of a lower quality standard than that naturally occurs; and (2) that one can, or <br />should, ignore drinking water standards as to those inhabitants that rely upon the <br />aquifer for their source of supply; as the town of San Luis and inhabitants in proximity to <br />the town. <br />Of greater concern is that the land dispersal concept is based upon a pyramid of <br />assumptions with inadequate detail. If any one of them is faulty or fails, the pyramid <br />collapses. <br />THE LYTLE WATER SOLUTIONS, LLC, REPORT LACKS NECESSARY DETAIL <br />AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION <br />The undated report of Lytle Water Solutions, LLC, is.attached to AM-03 and <br />contains a number of assumptions and contentions that merit examination. There is a <br />glaring lack of detail in the report. <br />MODFLOW is a three-dimensional numerical ground water <br />flow model that, when coupled with MT3DMS, can provide
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.