My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-12-05_REVISION - C1994082
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1994082
>
2008-12-05_REVISION - C1994082
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:38:41 PM
Creation date
12/8/2008 4:25:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
12/5/2008
Doc Name
Response to Comments
From
Seneca Coal Company
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR38
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Yoast Mine <br />7R-38, Pond 012 Slide Remediation <br />Page 2 <br />modifications in TR-37. We are also aware that the final sedimentation contm1 plan for the Pond 12 watershed may be <br />modified in the future, depending on the details of the final slide remediation plan. <br />Please address "short and long term sediment control measures for the Pond 12 Watershed" for <br />insertion m the permit, along with scheduhng commitments requested in Item 1, above. Include <br />references as appropriate to pertinent sediment control plan maps and details (approved and <br />"under review'), as well as measures that ha ve been implemented in the Lreld. <br />Response: As the Division is aware that even before the NOV was written and as discussed above, SCC had <br />developed and submitted a plan to provide long-term sediment control for the area by incorporating Pond <br />012A into the Pond 012 watershed. Since this sediment control system is currently inplace, it is also the <br />short-term control measure. When the Division reviews/approves the plan in TR-37, it will be evident that <br />the systems in place are sufficiently adequate to provide the required sediment control. This information was <br />submitted (in March 2008) in TR-37 and will be incorporated into the permit when approved. It appears to <br />be redundant to incorporate this information twice into the same document. <br />However, in order to comply with the DRMS request, this list of sediment control measures is enclosed for <br />insertion into Attachment 13-12B, Landslide Repair Plan. <br />3. The Division is concerned that the additional data anticipated this spring may not be sufficient to allow for completion of the <br />required analy ri r and mitigation. <br />Four of the eight test holes drilled between June 3db and July 2"d 2008 were "cased with slotted and solid 2-inch diameter <br />PVC pipe so thatgroundwater levels and soil movements could be monitored after the drilling was completed. " The other <br />four holes caved in, and test pits were backfilled. None of the four cased holes had exhibited slide movement as of the time <br />the report was submitted, meaning that we do notyet know the location of the failureplane of the slide. This information, as <br />well as observations ofgroundwater and surface water movements will be critical to developing remediation plans for the slide. <br />The four holes that were fitted with casings are Test Holes 1, 3, 6, and 8. We question whether the four holes described will <br />enable a sufficient understanding ofgroundwater and slide behavior, and we anticipate that the drilling of additional holes <br />may be necessary. No drilling was conducted outside of the slide block itself; if a cutedrain is warranted to intercept <br />groundwater above the slope, it will be necessary to know the subsurface conditions, e.g. depth to bedrock, in that area. <br />Similarly, to accomplish design of any proposed dewatering activities, an understanding ofgroundwater conditions in the <br />drainage upstream of the slide may need to be established <br />Please provide explanation for inclusion in the permit, addressing how the data from four cased <br />holes will be used in the analysis of the failure mechanism and design ofproposed remediation <br />efforts, along with a description ofany additional field investigation methods that are likely to <br />occur, in light of the apparent data limitations noted by the Division. <br />Response: NWCC completed a Supplemental Subsurface Investigation at the site on November 20, 2008. <br />The supplemental investigation consisted of the drilling of two additional test holes to the east of the slide <br />area and upstream of the failure area. The test holes were advanced to depths of 45 and 50 feet beneath the <br />existing ground surface and into the underlying bedrock materials. Both test holes were cased with slotted <br />and solid 2-inch diameter PVC pipe. In addition, PVC casing was installed in new test holes drilled adjacent to <br />Seneca Coal Company . P.O. Box 670 • Hayden, Colorado 81639 <br />Telephone (970) 276-5219 • FAX (970) 276-5222
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.