Laserfiche WebLink
RULE 2 PERMITS <br />Colowyo initiated range management and habitat improvement programs, and other mitigation measures <br />in 1976 to offset the expected impacts of mining. A detailed discussion of the wildlife mitigation plans is <br />set forth in Section 2.05.6. <br />Aerial Counts (See CDM report for update information) <br />Initial aerial transects were flown monthly throughout the winters of 1974-1975 and 1975-1976, and one <br />flight in 1977 to count elk and deer as well as coyotes, bobcats, raptors, etc. The counts were made to <br />establish population trends, activity patterns, and estimate numbers of animals wintering on the site. As <br />shown on the Big Game Use Information Map (Map 13), the study site was gridded into five areas to <br />allow for more detailed observations. The areas were flown on an east-west pattern. Flight lines were <br />normally about one-half mile apart, which allowed observations to be made a quarter of a mile on either <br />side of the aircraft. All observations were recorded on standard forms and included numbers of animals <br />location, habitat type, and when possible sex and age. <br />During the two winters of observations (1974-1975 and 1975-1976), deer and elk numbers fluctuated <br />from 43 to 101 and from 20 to 119, respectively. Conclusions that can be drawn from the data are as <br />follows: (1) the number of animals observed is greatly affected by counting conditions; (2) the severity of <br />winter affect the total number of animals observed within the area; (3) certain areas are utilized more than <br />others; and (4) deep snows have a greater impact orb deer numbers and areas of use than on elk. <br />As discussed earlier in this section, use of the winter range by deer and elk is directly related to weather <br />conditions and snow depth. <br />Information from the aerial surveys are shown in Table 2.04.11-6, Aerial Game Counts. <br />Calving and Fawning Areas <br />Counts were made each spring in late May and early June (peak of calving and fawning activities) of <br />1974 and 1975 and again in 1980. The study site was traversed by vehicle and on foot to identify the more <br />desirable areas as shown by the number of females with young. The counts were made early in the <br />morning or late evening. Binoculars or a spotting scope are used to observe the animals at considerable <br />distance. This technique helps to minimize undesirable or unnecessary flushing of the animals. By not <br />driving the animals into the heavy cover, more accurate counts can be made. <br />By establishing a baseline for numbers of calves and fawns born each spring, average reproductive rates, <br />and identification of desirable calving and fawning locations, potential or actual impacts can be evaluated. <br />Appropriate mitigation measures (as discussed in Section 2.05.6) have been implemented. <br />The deer and elk observations are summarized in Table 2.04.11-7, Sex and Age Ratios. <br />1980 Observations <br />Observations were conducted along a 15.6 mile road transect during the summer of 1980. The transect <br />was divided into eight segments to more accurately, determine distribution of animals. The counts were <br />made in early morning and late evening during June through August. All species observed along the <br />transect were noted, together with location and vegetation type. Information on sex, age, condition, etc. <br />were also recorded. The information will be used to compare calving and fawning activity, brood site, etc. <br />in the spring with population numbers, sex and age ratios, etc. through the end of the summer to <br />determine the condition of the potential breeding populations and what impacts, if any, have occurred. <br />Winter aerial counts will also be used to supplement the summer observations. The results of the <br />Rule 2 Permits 2.04.11-5 Revision Date: 6/23/08 <br />Revision No.: MR-91