My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-09-29_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (6)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981019A
>
2008-09-29_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:36:41 PM
Creation date
12/2/2008 4:13:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/29/2008
Section_Exhibit Name
2.04.7 Hydrology Information
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RULE 2 PERMITS <br />Sediment Yield and Loss Rates <br />Suspended sediment data is presented here separately from the water quality data for other constituents of <br />concern. Suspended sediment concentrations are a function of many variables including precipitation <br />patterns, soil types, vegetative cover, surface areas disturbed, slopes and drainage density. Suspended <br />sediments are important from land productivity and aquatic habitat perspectives. <br />Sediment yield estimates have been calculated by each investigation and are briefly summarized here. <br />The EMRIA Report estimated sediment yield based on a method developed by the Pacific Southwest <br />Interagency Committee in 1968 and assumed that the entire mine lease area was made up of seven <br />homogeneous basins. Extrapolations of the per basin estimates were extended to include the entire <br />drainage area. No data were collected to substantiate the model at that time. However, the EMRIA report <br />concluded that the sediment yields during and after reclamation would not be excessive. <br />VTN analyzed water quality data for suspended sediments for the period November, 1974 through July, <br />1975 for Goodspring Creek. Mean daily sediment concentrations ranged from a low of 58 mg/1 in <br />November to a high of 310 mg/1 in May. These data reflect the climatic conditions with low values <br />during low flow periods and increasing values occurring with spring runoff. Table 2.04.7-21 is a <br />presentation of this data. VTN also analyzed suspended sediment data for Wilson Creek below the <br />confluence with Taylor Creek. These data were collected for the period December, 1974 to September, <br />1975. Table 2.04.7-22 presents this information. Mean daily values are higher than those for Goodspring <br />Creek but still reflect the seasonal effects described previously.. Since that report it became apparent that <br />the Wilson Creek drainage was more susceptible to erosion than Goodspring Creek. Bank erosion on <br />Wilson Creek during the excessively high runoff in 1984 is more appropriately defined as mass wasting. <br />It has been estimated that in excess of one million cubic yards of unconsolidated material was down cut, <br />slumped, and transported by Wilson Creek during spring 1984. An analysis of TSS during June, 1984 <br />showed a concentration of 40,000 mg/1 in Wilson Creek. <br />The spring runoff period is especially important in analyzing suspended sediment data. Both drainages <br />showed tremendous increases in concentrations on May 27, 1975. These high values are probably a result <br />of a storm event occurring within or just prior to the sampling period. Nevertheless, the values were not <br />exceedingly high or even approaching values obtained in urban runoff studies. <br />Data (see Exhibit 7A) collected by the USGS on Wilson Creek for the period October, 1979 through <br />September, 1980 also show the tremendous seasonal variability. These data are presented in Table 2.04.7- <br />23. Exact locations for both sample periods, the previous VTN and the current USGS studies, were <br />assumed to be comparable. The USGS data encompass an entire year. Again the seasonal fluctuations are <br />apparent and storm event related concentrations increase dramatically over the ambient periods. <br />Storm events not only move surface particles through overland flow, but also create bottom scour which <br />is reflected in the increases. Also, the 1980 data was collected during an exceptionally wet year compared <br />to 1974-75. This is the prime cause for mean values being higher. The Colowyo Coal Company Permit <br />Application contains information regarding sediment yield from the mine site proper to Streeter Gulch. <br />These estimates of erosion using a rainfall factor of 30.0 were an average of 3.17 tons/acre/year broken <br />down into component parts of undisturbed and disturbed areas. The total acres contributing drainage to <br />Streeter Gulch were 1367 with a maximum of 181 acres being disturbed at any one time. Exhibit 7 <br />contains this information. <br />Striffler and Rhodes (1981) conducted field tests at eleven surface coal mines in Colorado to determine <br />erodibility and- infiltration capacity. of reclaimed land and overburden piles at each mine. Their report <br />"Hydrologic and Erosional Characteristics of Regraded Surface Coal Mined Land in Colorado" is briefly <br />Rule 2 Permits 2.04.7-23 Revision Date: 6/23/08 <br />Revision No.: MR-91
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.