Laserfiche WebLink
geotechnical reports. The mining side slopes in this location will be 3h:1v to 10 feet <br />below the expected water surface, and 2h:1 v from that point down to the pit bottom. A <br />horizontal bench will be located in the slope 3 feet above the expected water surface to <br />facilitate the construction of the slurry wall. <br />Case 6 - Existing oil/gas wells and tank battery to the southeast. The mining <br />operation is adjacent to existing oil/gas wells and an existing tank battery in this area. <br />The proposed setback for mining is 150 feet from the existing oil/gas wells and existing <br />tank battery. The mining depth was assumed to be 80 feet in this area. Bore log <br />information in the geotechnical reports shows the depth of the gravel to be greater than <br />80 feet in this area, however mining will terminate at a depth of 80 feet to maintain the <br />stability of the mining slope. The mining side slopes in this location will be 3h:1v to 10 <br />feet below the expected water surface, and 2h:1v from that point down to the pit bottom. <br />Case 7 - Existing Plumb Ditch, south branch, to the north. The mining operation is <br />adjacent to an existing ditch in this area. The proposed setback for mining is 25 feet from <br />the proposed permit boundary/existing ditch bank. The mining depth was assumed to be <br />80 feet in this area. Bore log information in the geotechnical reports shows the depth of <br />the gravel to be greater than 80 feet in this area, however mining will terminate at a <br />depth of 80 feet to maintain the stability of the mining slope. The mining side slopes in <br />this location will be 3h:1v to 10 feet below the expected water surface, and 2h:1v from <br />that point down to the pit bottom. <br />The cross-sections located in Appendix B show the proposed mining slope geometry, estimated <br />phreatic surface, location of the man made structures relative to the mining slope, and location <br />of the most critical slope failure surface for each case. <br />V - METHODOLOGY <br />The mining embankment configuration shown in the computer analysis represents the estimated <br />conditions for this site. If mining conditions differ from the estimated conditions, the slope <br />stability will need to be re-evaluated on a case by case basis. The Bishop Method was used in <br />the computer analysis for determining safety factors. The procedure searches for circular shear <br />failures and automatically searches for the lowest safety factor. 2,000 separate failure surfaces <br />were analyzed for each case. The required minimum safety factors are based on the current <br />standards used by the Colorado State Engineer's Office (SEO) in evaluating embankment <br />dams, and industry accepted standards for the evaluation of temporary structures during <br />construction. <br />Journey Ventures, LLC - Kersey Gravel Pit <br />Slope Stability Analysis <br />Page 3