Laserfiche WebLink
VII - CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />Case A - The resulting safety factor of 1.31 meets the SEO minimum requirement of 1.25 for an <br />embankment during construction. The resulting safety factor of 1.14 is above the SEO minimum <br />requirement of 1.0 for an embankment subject to earthquake loading. The proposed setback of <br />60 feet from the proposed permit boundary, and 70 feet from the edge of the existing County <br />Road HH.5 is satisfactory. <br />Case B - The resulting safety factor of 1.33 meets the SEO minimum requirement of 1.25 for an <br />embankment during construction. The resulting safety factor of 1.16 is above the SEO minimum <br />requirement of 1.0 for an embankment subject to earthquake loading. The proposed setback of <br />35 feet from the proposed permit boundary, and 65 feet from the proposed railroad corridor is <br />satisfactory. <br />Case C - The resulting safety factor of 1.31 meets the SEO minimum requirement of 1.25 for an <br />embankment during construction. The resulting safety factor of 1.16 is above the SEO minimum <br />requirement of 1.0 for an embankment subject to earthquake loading. The proposed of 80 feet <br />from the existing overhead power line is satisfactory. <br />Case D - The resulting safety factor of 1.30 meets the SEO minimum requirement of 1.25 for an <br />embankment during construction. The resulting safety factor of 1.15 is above the SEO minimum <br />requirement of 1.0 for an embankment subject to earthquake loading. The proposed setback of <br />85 feet from the parcel is satisfactory. <br />Case E - The resulting safety factor of 1.28 meets the SEO minimum requirement of 1.25 for an <br />embankment during construction. The resulting safety factor of 1.13 is above the SEO minimum <br />requirement of 1.0 for an embankment subject to earthquake loading. The proposed setback of <br />80 feet from the closest irrigation ditch bank is satisfactory. <br />Case F - The resulting safety factor of 1.34 meets the SEO minimum requirement of 1.25 for an <br />embankment during construction. The resulting safety factor of 1.18 is above the SEO minimum <br />requirement of 1.0 for an embankment subject to earthquake loading. The proposed setback of <br />85 feet from the boundary of the easement is satisfactory. <br />Case G - The resulting safety factor of 1.32 meets the SEO minimum requirement of 1.25 for an <br />embankment during construction. The resulting safety factor of 1.16 is above the SEO minimum <br />requirement of 1.0 for an embankment subject to earthquake loading. The proposed setback of <br />30 feet from the proposed permit boundary, 80 feet from the property boundary, and 87 feet <br />from the edge of the existing wetland area is satisfactory. <br />West Farm Gravel Pit <br />Slope Stability Analysis <br />Page 5