My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-06-09_REVISION - C1980007 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2008-06-09_REVISION - C1980007 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:32:40 PM
Creation date
11/20/2008 12:54:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/9/2008
Doc Name
Revised Pages Part 2
Type & Sequence
TR111
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />• <br /> <br />Fish and Wildlife <br />Red-naped Sapsuckers <br />Red-naped sapsuckers are associated with <br />aspen forests or conifer forests mixed with <br />aspen. However, they are most strongly <br />associated with mature aspen. Aspen is <br />important for successful reproduction and <br />foraging, especially in close proximity to small <br />openings and riparian zones. They will <br />preferentially nest in aspen, even when conifer <br />snags are available. Red-naped sapsuckers <br />construct new cavities each year, frequently in <br />the wine tree. Nest trees are either green with <br />heart rot, or dead. Their territory size is 5 to 12 <br />acres. In Colorado, nest trees average 9.2 <br />inches diameter and 3 to 35 feet in height <br />(CPIF 2005f). Orientation of nest cavities is <br />generally southward. Their diet consists of <br />insects, tree sap from sap wells, and some <br />fruits; they also hawk flying insects. <br />Abandoned nest cavities are important to many <br />secondary cavity nesters. <br />Population trends of this species are not <br />adequately monitored by the Breeding Bird <br />Survey in Colorado, but populations appear to <br />be stable or slightly increasing at the <br />continental scale. They were present on an <br />average of 49.86 percent of the survey routes in <br />Physiographic Area 62 in Colorado, 1988- <br />1998, at an average abundance of 1.11 <br />individuals per route (CPIF 2000e). <br />Physiographic Area 62 covers much of the <br />central region of Colorado. This physiographic <br />area encompasses the majority of the forested <br />lands in Colorado. This species is monitored by <br />the Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory - <br />Monitoring Colorado Birds with point <br />transects. <br />Northern Goshawk <br />Northern goshawks are associated with mature <br />forests and can use a variety of forests such as <br />coniferous, deciduous, or mixed forests. On the <br />GMUG, goshawks are strongly associated with <br />mature aspen stands, although they also use <br />mature ponderosa pine, lodgepole pine and <br />spruce/fir stands (USDA FS 2001b). There are <br />730,525 acres of suitable goshawk nesting <br />habitat on the GMUG (USDA FS 2001b) and <br />1,753 acres in the project area (0.2 percent of <br />Forest-wide). This habitat is primarily <br />composed of aspen. <br />Northern goshawks appear to be well <br />distributed throughout the GMUG, based on the <br />current available information (USDA FS <br />2001b) and goshawk populations are stable, <br />and ample suitable habitat is available to <br />support a viable population (USDA FS 2001b). <br />Goshawks are known and documented to occur <br />and nest in the Paonia District. Although nest <br />sites have not been. documented in the project <br />area, suitable habitat is present. <br />A total of 110 active, alternative, and suspected <br />goshawk nests have been found across the <br />Forest. A total of 57 known active goshawk <br />nests have been found between 1992 and 2003; <br />over 90 percent of the nests built and occupied <br />by goshawks are in aspen trees. Between 1992 <br />and 2003 there have been 28 designated <br />goshawk territories reported (LeFevre 2004). <br />These territories are known to have been <br />occupied by goshawks for one year or more. A <br />minimum of 10 pairs of breeding birds has <br />been provided as an estimate of a local viable <br />goshawk population on the GMUG (USDA FS <br />2001b). Based on monitoring since 1984, there <br />is a high probability that there are more than 10 <br />goshawk pairs that have been surviving and <br />reproducing on the GMUG. <br />Migratory Birds <br />Executive Order (EO 13186) enacted in 2001 <br />requires federal agencies to consider the effect <br />of projects on migratory birds, particularly <br />those species for which there may be <br />conservation concern. Migratory bird species of <br />concern, for which project-level conservation <br />opportunities may be applicable, are identified <br />by the Endangered Species Act, the Regional <br />Forester's sensitive species list, the Forest's <br />MIS list, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife <br />Service's Birds of Conservation Concern list <br />(U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2002). This <br />portion of the analysis is focused on reviewing <br />the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Birds of <br />Deer Creek Ventilation Shaft and E Seam Methane Drainage Wells FEIS <br />95 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.