Laserfiche WebLink
tion <br />'• <br />• <br />_:.. <br />preparation methods to keep fertile topsoil <br />intact, revegetating areas disturbed during road <br />construction, and design mitigations and <br />restoration to ensure that 80 percent original. <br />ground cover occurs within 5 years after <br />disturbance. The approved grass/forb seed mix <br />(Table 3-7) would establish quickly in <br />prepared soils, providing adequate cover to <br />limit soil erosion within a few years after <br />seeding. <br />Additionally, the mountain brush. seed mix <br />provides valuable forage for both wildlife and <br />livestock; providing increased. foraging <br />opportunities for up to 10 to 20 years in <br />Gambel oak types (see Fish and Wildlife and <br />Livestock Management sections). This would <br />increase plant species diversity and community <br />edge and contrast to improve wildlife habitat, <br />in line with Forest Plan goals for vegetation <br />and wildlife management. <br />These areas would eventually convert to <br />surrounding vegetation types, in most cases. <br />Site conversion to pre-disturbance vegetation <br />type would vary based environmental, vegeta- <br />tive and disturbance factors. Proposed design <br />criteria would minimize the short-term distur- <br />bance effects on vegetation. <br />Although minimal, the potential for long-term <br />vegetation community alteration exists. If <br />spruce or subalpine fir is removed, these slow- <br />growing trees would likely take several decades <br />to dominate the site again. Following seeding, <br />reintroduction of trees into well established <br />herbaceous vegetation may be delayed due to <br />resource competition among species, further <br />slowing tree development. Vegetation losses in <br />these communities would be long term despite <br />the comprehensive reclamation and revegeta- <br />tion that would. follow well abandomnent. <br />Mitigation design criteria stipulate 11 staging <br />areas would be created to stockpile rnaterials <br />and equipment during project implementation <br />to reduce vegetation disturbance. Two of the <br />staging areas already exist; five other areas <br />would also be MDW pads, resulting in four <br />newly disturbed staging areas. Disturbance at <br />new and existing staging areas would be ap- <br />proximately 4 acres (Table 3-6). Soil com- <br />paction and vegetation clearing and trampling <br />would be the major forms of disturbance. These <br />impacts would be short-teen and full reclama- <br />tion would occur when the sites are no longer <br />needed. <br />Riparian Vegetation <br />If the Forest Service grants relief to the no <br />surface occupancy lease stipulation, riparian <br />ecosystems would be affected by soil. <br />disturbance and vegetation damage and loss <br />resulting from new access road construction. <br />During construction vegetative ground cover <br />would be damaged or destroyed. Furthermore, <br />disturbance in riparian areas would increase the <br />likelihood of noxious weed invasion into the <br />disturbance area. <br />Approximately 10 acres of riparian vegetation <br />fall within potential road corridor in the project <br />area (Table 3-8). Design criteria state riparian <br />vegetation would be avoided wherever <br />possible; however, the potential exists for some <br />road building effects on riparian vegetation. <br />These areas are primarily associated with <br />stream crossings and roads located along the <br />Dry Fork of Minnesota Creek. Where riparian <br />habitats could not be avoided, road building <br />would result in vegetation loss and disturbance. <br />Soil erosion would be mitigated by use of silt <br />fences or other erosion control devices in the <br />100-foot WIZ. Disturbed vegetation would <br />recover quickly due to favorable site conditions <br />such as highly productive soils and available <br />water found in riparian habitats. Riparian <br />vegetation loss would be short-teen; lasting the <br />life of the project as riparian habitat would <br />recover relatively quickly following road <br />decommissioning and revegetation. Long-term <br />loss of riparian habitat is not expected. <br />Approximately three acres of willow and alder <br />cover types fall within MDW pad windows. <br />These windows are located along the upper Dry <br />Fork of Minnesota Creek in the proximity of <br />the Poison Gulch confluence, and along Lick <br />Creek in the southern end of the project area. <br />Deer Creek Ventilation Shaft and E Seam Methane Drainage Wells FEIS <br />87 <br />