My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-06-09_REVISION - C1980007 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2008-06-09_REVISION - C1980007 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:32:40 PM
Creation date
11/20/2008 12:54:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/9/2008
Doc Name
Revised Pages Part 2
Type & Sequence
TR111
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Vegetation <br />• <br />~`.• <br /> <br />as administered by the CDRMS with. oversight <br />from the OSM, which govern. all direct effects <br />of coal ).Wining, including those that may <br />impact soils. These acts and attendant <br />regulations require that topsoil. be removed, <br />stockpiled, and replaced on reclaimed surfaces <br />associated with construction or mining <br />disturbance. Other impacts to the soil resource <br />that may occur as a result of mining, including <br />landslides and erosion, must be mitigated to <br />stabilize the surface and return the land to an <br />approved post-mining land use. <br />Vegetation <br />Affected Environment <br />Upland Vegetation <br />The analysis area for vegetation resources is <br />the project area. Dominant vegetation types in <br />the project area is predominantly woodlarids <br />dominated by Gambel oak (Quercus ganzbelii) <br />with an estimated coverage of 3,903 acres and <br />forest dominated by quaking aspen (Populus <br />t~•enauloides) with an approximate coverage of <br />1,754 acres (Table 3-4) (Figure 10). Dense <br />stands of oak occur on the more xeric, south- <br />facing slopes and have a brushy understory <br />dominated by serviceberry (Amelanchie~~ sp.), <br />snowberry, and chokecherry (Prunus <br />virginiana), and thin to moderate ground cover <br />of grass and low forbs. Aspen stands dominate <br />the mesic, northerly aspects and often have a <br />shrub understory predominately consisting of <br />snowberry (SynzphoricaYpos spp.) (Greystone <br />2001). Interspersed with this habitat type are <br />open sagebrush (Artemesia spp.) meadows and <br />small stands of aspen (Greystone 2001). Acres <br />of each cover type found in the potential well <br />pad window, ventilation shaft location, and <br />staging area sites are presented in Table 3-4. <br />MDW pad windows over estimate the <br />disturbance associated with pad construction <br />and provide a way to analyze all possible <br />vegetation types potentially impacted by <br />MDW construction. <br />Table 3-4 <br />Acres of Vegetation Cover Types In The <br />Project Area <br /> <br />Cover Type Project Area <br />Acres <br />Barren 2 <br />Herbaceous 15 <br />Gambel oak 3,903 <br />Shrub 115 <br />Willow 55 <br />Quaking aspen 1.,754 <br />Pinyon and juniper 64 <br />Spruce and subalpine fir 74 <br />Water 18 <br />Source: GIS derived acres based on CVU vegetation layer. <br />Riparian Vegetation <br />Forest Service Manuals on Watershed <br />Protection and Wildlife, Fish, and Sensitive <br />Plant Habitat Management defines riparian <br />areas as geographically delineable areas with <br />distinctive resource values and characteristics of <br />aquatic and riparian ecosystems (with the <br />riparian ecosystems as transition areas between <br />the aquatic ecosystem and the adjacent <br />terrestrial ecosystem), identified by soil <br />characteristics or distinctive vegetation <br />communities that require free or unbound water. <br />Wetlands differ from riparian ecosystems <br />because wetlands require saturated or seasonally <br />saturated soils with obligate plants (Cowardin <br />and others 1979). Approximately seven acres of <br />marsh are located along the Dry Fork of <br />Minnesota Creek, the majority of which are just <br />upstream from Minnesota Reservoir. In <br />addition, there are four intermittent lakes in the <br />project area which likely support wetland <br />habitat. Three of the lakes are located along <br />Lick Creek along the southern project area <br />boundary, the fourth intermittent lake is east of <br />Poison Gulch; combined, the lakes account for 1 <br />acre of possible wetland habitat. These lakes are <br />fed by snowmelt and monsoon rainfall. Wetland <br />Deer Creek Ventilation Shaft and E Seam Methane Drainage Wells FEIS <br />79 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.