My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-06-09_REVISION - C1980007 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2008-06-09_REVISION - C1980007 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:32:40 PM
Creation date
11/20/2008 12:54:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/9/2008
Doc Name
Revised Pages Part 2
Type & Sequence
TR111
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Water <br /> <br /> <br />Fork and Lower Dry Fork Alluvial. wells. <br />Based on water quality data provided in the <br />West Elk Mine 2005 Annual Hydrology <br />Report, water quality for alluvial/colluvial <br />ground water aquifers and shallow perched <br />ground water is colntnonly similar to surface <br />water quality (HydroGeo 2006). <br />Recharge to these shallow aquifers occurs <br />through stream flows under high. flow <br />conditions and direct infiltration of runoff from <br />precipitation and snowmelt. Under low flow <br />conditions, the saturated alluviaUcolluvial <br />deposits in the larger drainages discharge water <br />to the stream channel (ground water recharge), <br />supplying perennial surface water flows via <br />springs and seeps. Given the semi-arid <br />conditions in the area and relatively steep <br />stream gradients, many of the smaller drainages <br />do not receive enough recharge to maintain <br />year-round surface flow. <br />Bedrock ground water resources in the project <br />area are limited to isolated perched lenses and <br />fracture/fault zones. There are several bedrock <br />groundwater monitoring wells in the project <br />area that are monitored by the West Elk Mine <br />hydrologic program. These wells are sampled <br />three times per year for field parameters and <br />water level and once per annum for laboratory <br />water quality analysis for parameter specified <br />in the hydrologic monitoring program. Age- <br />dating chemical analyses from the West Elk <br />monitoring program have shown that bedrock <br />groundwater resources in the vicinity of the <br />mine are part of a deep inactive system that is <br />not in direct contact with near-surface water <br />(USDA F S 2003a). Deeper perched ground <br />water and any ground water associated with the <br />coal seams that have been in contact with shale <br />and mudstone may exhibit elevated levels of <br />total dissolved solids (HydroGeo 2006). <br />Groundwater may also be present to a limited <br />extent within coal seams. Bedrock and <br />associated coal seams dip to the northeast, with <br />the uppermost strata outcropping along the <br />North Fork Valley. The occurrence of <br />groundwater springs in the North Fork outcrops <br />of the Mesa Verde formation is rare. BLM and <br />MCC report that the coal seams in the West Elk <br />Mine area are typically dry, with average <br />moisture content of 5 percent. Groundwater <br />discharges from faults intercepted by longwall <br />panels in the West Ellc Mine have experienced <br />initially high volume discharge periods <br />followed diminishing to negligible flow within <br />a short time period. No effects on surface water <br />resources have been documented from <br />interception of water-bearing faults <br />underground. Not all faults encountered during <br />mining have contained water. Mine underdrain <br />and mine inflow sites are currently monitored <br />for flow and water quality by the West Elk <br />hydrologic program. The total inflow for the <br />West Elk Mine is approximately 200 acre-feet <br />per year (HydroGeo 2006). <br />Direct and Indirect Effects <br />Alternative 7 <br />Surface Water <br />Under the no action alternative, current <br />management plans, existing coal recovery <br />related, and non-coal related activities would <br />continue to occur and/or guide management of <br />the project area. Since additional mining- <br />related surface disturbances would not occur, or <br />would be limited to surface resource <br />monitoring activities such as monitoring wells, <br />surface water monitoring stations, etc., <br />Alternative 1 would have no or negligible <br />effects on surface water resources. <br />Ground Water <br />Under Alternative 1, current management plans <br />and non-coal related activities would continue <br />to occur and/or guide management of the <br />project area. Since mining-related subsurface <br />disturbances would not occur, or be limited to <br />surface resource monitoring activities such as <br />monitoring wells, surface water monitoring <br />stations, etc., Alternative 1 would have no or <br />negligible effects on ground water resources. <br />Deer Creek Ventilation Shaft and E Seain Methane Drainage Wells FEIS <br />65 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.