Laserfiche WebLink
15. The Sedcad designs use a permissivity, or flow rate, value of 14 gal/min/ft2 for straw <br />bales. As had been discussed previously in Minor Revision No. 64 back in 2002, the <br />Division and Oxbow's consultant disagreed as to the authenticity of that value. Although <br />the value appears in a published work, the value was corrected in a later publication by <br />two of the three original authors. The Division agreed to the use of the value in MR-64 <br />with a disclaimer added to the permit text. Please either justify Oxbow's position in using <br />this value, revise the straw bale permisssivity value accordingly in the Secad designs and <br />text or omit from TR-60 the proposed use of straw bales as sediment control. <br />16. In the last paragraph on revised page 2.05-37, it is stated that small area exemptions are <br />identified on Map 2.05-M4. Please add to that sentence that small area exemptions for the <br />Bear Creek fan site are identified on Map 2.05-E 1-BCA2. <br />17. The second paragraph on the revised page that contains Table 2.05-E5-T2 contains a <br />discussion on the reclamation of satellite facilities. Please add the Bear Creek fan site to <br />this discussion. Also, please add the appropriate page number to this page. <br />18. In the first sentence of the last paragraph on revised page 2.05-12b, please include the <br />correct exhibit numbers for the two referenced exhibits. <br />19. Please add a discussion to Section 2.05.6(3) of the permit application on the probable <br />hydrologic consequences of the Bear Creek fan site on Bear Creek. <br />cc: Sandy Brown <br />c:/word/elkcreek/tr60memo 1 <br />3