My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-10-06_REVISION - M1980244
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2008-10-06_REVISION - M1980244
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:52:19 PM
Creation date
11/4/2008 10:49:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
10/6/2008
Doc Name
Additional Response to Adequacy Review- Reclamation, High Wall Stability and Hydrogeochemistry
From
CC&V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM9
Email Name
BMK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
by the Carlton Tunnel through what would have otherwise become increasingly <br />preferential pathways. <br />VI. S.: We must consider the possibility that waste rock leachate may escape the capture system, as a <br />result of unforeseen circumstances such as extreme precipitation events, dump geotechnical failures, <br />short circuiting, etc., and therefore potential interactions of the leachate with geologic material outside <br />the diatreme must be taken into account. Without such an assessment, the downgradient ground water <br />monitoring must be extensive. The Operator cites the numerous humidity cell tests. How many of the <br />tests involved interaction of acidic waste rock leachate with geologic materials outside of the diatreme? <br />CC&V Response: <br />CC&V has considered the possibility that leachate from overburden may escape the <br />diatremal capture system. CC&V has conducted a water balance evaluation for the <br />diatreme and surrounding areas (MLE Application, Appendix 1, Volume II, Attachment <br />1) and for the Grassy Valley drainage, the only drainage within the permit area with <br />frequent surface flow. The results of both these evaluations is that there is no water that <br />contacts mining material that is not expected to enter the diatremal rock and report to the <br />regional ground water table intersected by the Carlton Tunnel. These studies show that <br />flow from the diatreme to the surrounding granite is impossible; the surrounding granite <br />is always upgradient from the saturated portion of the diatreme. Even if it were possible, <br />the low hydraulic conductivity of the Precambrian rock would prevent more than a very <br />small flow. <br />However, unforeseen excursions are always possible in any mining activity. With the <br />guidance and concurrence of DRMS and CDPHE, CC&V has developed and maintained <br />an extensive groundwater and surface water monitoring system, which will identify any <br />excursions of mine-related constituents from the permitted area to the external <br />environment. These monitoring systems and locations are described in MLE <br />Application, Appendix 2, Volume II, and cover groundwater and surface water in Grassy <br />Valley, Vindicator Valley, Wilson Creek, Bateman Creek, Arequa Gulch, Gold Run, <br />Squaw Gulch, Poverty Gulch, and Cripple Creek. As a part of the MLE permit review <br />process, DRMS recommended, and CC&V has proposed, augmentation of the existing <br />Poverty Gulch monitoring to recognize the proposed additional mine disturbance in that <br />drainage. <br />With respect to the humidity cell testing, a total of 17 of the 42 tests (40%) were <br />conducted in the Precambrian rock (granite, granodiorite, or schist) that surround the <br />diatremal rocks (MLE Application, Appendix 1, Volume II, Attachment 1, p 1-1). This <br />extensive database is considered appropriate to support the detailed evaluation of the <br />interaction of oxidants with the rock, both in-situ and after mining. <br />VI. T.: Flow rate will be irrelevant only if the uniform batch reactor concept proposed by the Operator <br />turns out to be correct, a concept that will only be validated through long-term post-closure monitoring. <br />CC&V Response: <br />CC&V's conclusion that the flow rate is irrelevant to the impact of transport of sulfate <br />oxidation products from ECOSA is derived as follows. Oxidation will take place at some <br />rate in the ECOSA pile (depending on the access of oxygen to the overburden, which is <br />designed to be very limited). The oxidation releases a quantity of sulfate and metals at a <br />rate that is primarily limited by the oxygen availability. This mass of materials is <br />dissolved by whatever infiltrating flow occurs, and is transported out of the ECOSA by <br />that same flow. If the flow rate is high, the concentration is lower; if the flow rate is low <br />the concentration is higher. The mass of dissolved constituents is transported through the <br />diatreme to the regional ground water table intersected by the Carlton Tunnel (as further <br />demonstrated by the results of the current ECOSA hydrology drilling program, which <br />show that ECOSA is within the collection area of the diatreme). The mass of constituents
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.