Laserfiche WebLink
by the Carlton Tunnel through what would have otherwise become increasingly <br />preferential pathways. <br />VI. S.: We must consider the possibility that waste rock leachate may escape the capture system, as a <br />result of unforeseen circumstances such as extreme precipitation events, dump geotechnical failures, <br />short circuiting, etc., and therefore potential interactions of the leachate with geologic material outside <br />the diatreme must be taken into account. Without such an assessment, the downgradient ground water <br />monitoring must be extensive. The Operator cites the numerous humidity cell tests. How many of the <br />tests involved interaction of acidic waste rock leachate with geologic materials outside of the diatreme? <br />CC&V Response: <br />CC&V has considered the possibility that leachate from overburden may escape the <br />diatremal capture system. CC&V has conducted a water balance evaluation for the <br />diatreme and surrounding areas (MLE Application, Appendix 1, Volume II, Attachment <br />1) and for the Grassy Valley drainage, the only drainage within the permit area with <br />frequent surface flow. The results of both these evaluations is that there is no water that <br />contacts mining material that is not expected to enter the diatremal rock and report to the <br />regional ground water table intersected by the Carlton Tunnel. These studies show that <br />flow from the diatreme to the surrounding granite is impossible; the surrounding granite <br />is always upgradient from the saturated portion of the diatreme. Even if it were possible, <br />the low hydraulic conductivity of the Precambrian rock would prevent more than a very <br />small flow. <br />However, unforeseen excursions are always possible in any mining activity. With the <br />guidance and concurrence of DRMS and CDPHE, CC&V has developed and maintained <br />an extensive groundwater and surface water monitoring system, which will identify any <br />excursions of mine-related constituents from the permitted area to the external <br />environment. These monitoring systems and locations are described in MLE <br />Application, Appendix 2, Volume II, and cover groundwater and surface water in Grassy <br />Valley, Vindicator Valley, Wilson Creek, Bateman Creek, Arequa Gulch, Gold Run, <br />Squaw Gulch, Poverty Gulch, and Cripple Creek. As a part of the MLE permit review <br />process, DRMS recommended, and CC&V has proposed, augmentation of the existing <br />Poverty Gulch monitoring to recognize the proposed additional mine disturbance in that <br />drainage. <br />With respect to the humidity cell testing, a total of 17 of the 42 tests (40%) were <br />conducted in the Precambrian rock (granite, granodiorite, or schist) that surround the <br />diatremal rocks (MLE Application, Appendix 1, Volume II, Attachment 1, p 1-1). This <br />extensive database is considered appropriate to support the detailed evaluation of the <br />interaction of oxidants with the rock, both in-situ and after mining. <br />VI. T.: Flow rate will be irrelevant only if the uniform batch reactor concept proposed by the Operator <br />turns out to be correct, a concept that will only be validated through long-term post-closure monitoring. <br />CC&V Response: <br />CC&V's conclusion that the flow rate is irrelevant to the impact of transport of sulfate <br />oxidation products from ECOSA is derived as follows. Oxidation will take place at some <br />rate in the ECOSA pile (depending on the access of oxygen to the overburden, which is <br />designed to be very limited). The oxidation releases a quantity of sulfate and metals at a <br />rate that is primarily limited by the oxygen availability. This mass of materials is <br />dissolved by whatever infiltrating flow occurs, and is transported out of the ECOSA by <br />that same flow. If the flow rate is high, the concentration is lower; if the flow rate is low <br />the concentration is higher. The mass of dissolved constituents is transported through the <br />diatreme to the regional ground water table intersected by the Carlton Tunnel (as further <br />demonstrated by the results of the current ECOSA hydrology drilling program, which <br />show that ECOSA is within the collection area of the diatreme). The mass of constituents