Laserfiche WebLink
Table 3 <br />Aggregate Industries-WCR Inc. Applegate <br />Group,. - <br />WW Farms Expansion MaY-08 <br />Consumptive Use Summary for 2.5 shares of Whitnnv nitrh Job No. 06-103 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />onth <br />Average <br />Diversion for <br />Headgate <br />a <br />f) <br />(A) <br />Pro-Rata Farm <br />Headgate <br />Delivery (FHD) <br /> <br />-o a <br />(B) <br />Water <br />Available Crop Irrigation Actual Historic Total <br />to Crop Requirement Consumptive Return <br /> <br />a CIR a Use a Flows a <br />(C) (D) (E) (F) <br />Surface <br />Return <br />Flows <br /> <br />a <br />G) <br /> <br />Subsurface <br />Return <br /> <br />Flows a <br />(H) <br />Lagged <br />Subsurface <br />Return Flows <br /> <br />La, <br />11) Historic <br />Accretions/ <br />Depletions <br />at River <br /> <br />La, <br />(1) <br />Jan 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 -1.1 <br />Feb 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 -1.0 <br />Mar 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 -0.9 <br />Apr 267 1.8 1.1 1.4 0.6 1.1 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.4 <br />May 1349 9.0 5.4 4.7 4.0 4.9 2.5 2.5 0.9 5.6 <br />Jun 1776 11.8 7.1 9.0 6.9 4.9 2.4 2.4 1.2 8.1 <br />Jul 2969 19.7 11.8 11.8 10.7 9.0 4.5 4.5 1.5 13.7 <br />Aug 2638 17.5 10.5 10.7 10.0 7.5 3.8 3.8 2.0 11.8 <br />Sep 1491 9.9 5.9 5.1 4.8 5.1 2.6 2.6 2.2 5.2 <br />Oct 103 0.7 0.4 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.2 2.0 -1.6 <br />Nov 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 -1.6 <br />Dec 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 -1.3 <br />TOTAL 10,595.5 70.4 42.2 43.8 37.3 33.1 16.6 16.6 16.6 37.3 <br />Notes: <br />A Study Period from 1950-2004; data taken from cdss website (http://cdss.state.co.us: <br />B Pro-Rata Farm Headgate Delivery is: Diversions less 15% ditch los <br />C Irrigation assumed to be 60% efficient <br />D Calculated for 1/2 alfalfa and 1/2 corn grain, using Greeley UNC weather station (1950-2004) using State CU calibrated coefficients <br />E Lesser of the Water Available or the Crop Irrigation Requiremenl <br />F FHD (Col B) - Actual CU (Col E) <br />G Surface Returns were assumed to be SO% <br />H Subsurface Returns were assumed to be 50% <br />I Lagged flows were determined with AWAS using: 4,210 ft from river, 11,440 ft (width of alluvium), Trans= 180,000 gpd/ft, S= 0.20' <br />J Net Accretions (shown as positive) and depletions (shown as negative) to the Rive <br />River Resource <br />Amendment to Permit M1999098 112C <br />Page G17 of G37