My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-10-31_PERMIT FILE - M2008017 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2008017
>
2008-10-31_PERMIT FILE - M2008017 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:37:36 PM
Creation date
11/3/2008 11:53:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2008017
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
10/31/2008
Doc Name
Slope Stability Report Review
From
DRMS-acs
To
DRMS-mac
Email Name
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />COLORADO <br />D IV IS I ON OF <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING <br />SAFETY <br />DATE: <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />RE. <br />October 31, 2008 <br />Michael Cunningham <br />Allen Sorenson <br /> <br />Slope Stability Report Review, Broken Arrow Investments, LLC, <br />Derr Pit, File No. M-2008-017 <br />Bill Ritter, Jr. <br />Governor <br />Harris D. Sherman <br />Executive Director <br />Ronald W. Cattany <br />Division Director <br />Natural Resource Trustee <br />The Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety engineering staff (DRMS) have reviewed the Slope Stability <br />Report provided with the above reference permit application. DRMS does not necessarily concur with all of <br />the assumptions and determinations included in the report, as listed here: <br />1. The internal friction angle input to the analyses for the slurry wall is too high. However, the slurry <br />wall is not a factor in any of the lowest safety factor potential failure surfaces, so the results and <br />conclusions contained in the report are unaffected. <br />2. The minimum safety factor selected for the report is said to have been taken from the Colorado State <br />Engineer's Dam Safety Regulations. In fact, the selected safety factors are from the State Engineer's <br />regulations for dam stability at end of dam construction. The State Engineer's criteria for long term <br />dam stability are much more restrictive (1.5 safety factor as opposed to 1.3). Also, the safety factors <br />for dam safety where shale or claystone foundation is present, as it is at the toe of the proposed Derr <br />Pit mined slopes, may require consideration of the residual strength of the shale or claystone, and the <br />residual strength would be much less than the shear strength input for weathered bedrock for the Derr <br />Pit analyses. <br />Regardless of the foregoing, the DRMS has determined that the setbacks and mine slopes proposed for the <br />Derr Pit are protective of nearby infrastructure and can be approved. Critical to this determination is the mine <br />plan requirement to maintain excavated slopes at an angle no steeper than 311:1 V at all times during operation <br />of the pit. Therefore, the Operator must be notified that the DRMS will consider mining at an excavation <br />slope of steeper than 3H:1 V to be a serious violation of the permit that will initiate an immediate enforcement <br />action. <br />c:\acs files ft Documents 4-19-06 thn,\derr pit ctnh;i'tr < i g dos -- <br />-------^ <br />Office of Office of <br />Mined Land Reclamation Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.