My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-05-29_REVISION - M1977285
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977285
>
2008-05-29_REVISION - M1977285
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 10:32:51 AM
Creation date
10/28/2008 12:22:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977285
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
5/29/2008
Doc Name
Drainage report for Sunday Mines Group
From
Denison Mines
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AD1
Email Name
RCO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Section 2 <br />Topaz Mine <br />To determine the channel capacity, CDM performed a Manning's equation analysis. <br />Flow depth and velocity were calculated using the following equations for the 100- <br />year peak discharges, cross section geometry (rectangular), and Manning's n values <br />listed in Table 2-2. <br />Q=VA <br />A = (b + zh)h <br />2/3 <br />V _ 1.49 (b + zh)h s1/2 <br />n b+2h 1+z2 <br />where: <br />Q = discharge in cfs <br />V = velocity in feet per second (ft/ sec) <br />z: 1 = side slope <br />A = flow area in square feet (ft2) <br />b = bottom width of the cross section in feet (ft) <br />h = flow depth in ft <br />S = channel slope in feet/feet (ft/ft) <br />n = Manning's roughness coefficient (unitless) <br />. .._1.- 9- r-h-nnMe 4 nnel 2 Capacity Analysis <br />i axle z-z in u t values 101 U .a••••?•? -•.- _ __ __-- <br />b <br />Channel 100- r Q S n z ft <br /> cfs ftift ft/ft <br />1 5.79 0.025 0.035 3 3 <br />2 4.25 0.037 0.035 3 3 <br />The calculated channel depths and velocities of Channels 1 and 2 are shown in <br />Table 2-3. CDM recommends adding 2-feet of freeboard to the calculated flow depth <br />to account for potential channel overtopping. Given rectangular channels with bottom <br />widths of 3 feet each, a design depth of 2.5 feet is recommended for Channels 1 and 2. <br />for Channels 1 and 2 <br />i aale z-s Laiu ulatlon Summ <br />h a <br />Freeboard <br />Design Depth <br />V <br />Channel <br /> ft ft ft fUsec <br />1 0.43 2 2.43 3.16 <br />2 032 2 2.32 3.30 <br />To determine the appropriate channel lining (e.g., vegetated or riprap) for Channels 1 <br />and 2, CDM calculated flow velocities using information from the Urban Drainage <br />and Flood Control District (UDFCD) Drainage Criteria manual (UDFCD 2005). <br />UDFCD recommends flow velocity be less than 5 feet per second (ft/sec) for grass- <br />lined channels and velocities less than 12 ft/ sec for riprap channels (UDFCD 2005). <br />Based on UDFCD recommendations, a Manning's n value of 0.035 was selected for <br />design calculations to check the capacity of grass-lined channels. Based on these <br /> <br />2-3 <br />0:\84988- Denison\Task order 1 -Sunday Was Drainage Study\RepoMFinal ReporWinal Sunday Was Drainage Report _052208.dx
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.