My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-07-02_PERMIT FILE - C1996083 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2008-07-02_PERMIT FILE - C1996083 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:33:57 PM
Creation date
10/27/2008 11:50:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/2/2008
Doc Name
Proposed Gob Pile -Baseline Vegetation Survey, Cedar Creek Assoc, December 2006
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume III Exhibit 05 Baseline Vegetation
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and reference area variables for each vegetation community will be factored into the procedure <br />for determination of revegetation success. For the two communities, these ratios are: Juniper <br />Woodland (1.426 for ground cover and 0.971 for production) and for Mountain Shrub (0.910 for <br /> <br />C <br />Table E5-1 Bowie - 2006 <br />Baseline Study Area -Re ference Area Statistical Comparison <br /> Juniper Woodland Juniper Woodland Juniper Woodland Mixed Shrubland <br /> (New RA) (Old RA) Reference <br /> Nom,, <br />Reference <br />Baseline PASS/ Old <br />Reference <br />Baseline <br />FA <br />/ New <br />Reference Wd <br />Reference pA~/ <br />FAIL Reference <br />Area <br />Baseline PASS/ <br />FAIL <br /> Area PAIL Area IL ~~ Area <br />otal Cover <br />Estimated Mean (% cover) <br />36.15 51.55 <br />44.90 51.55 <br />36.15 44.90 <br />65.20 59.30 <br />SamplelrFian~ 52.45 144.47 61.57 144.47 52.45 61.57 68.27 54.33 <br />leSiemlected <br />Sam zo zo 20 zo zo 20 FAIL zo zo FAIL <br />p FAIL FAIL 85 <br />2 3 <br />06 3 <br />06 <br />9oledYriance 4.92 4.92 5.15 5.15 285 . . . <br />Calculates t statistic (t*) 4.9 078 2.0719 3.6647 2.3830 <br />Tabular Value fort 20244 2'0244 2'0244 2.0244 <br />otal Production <br />Estimated Mean (g/O.Sm') 13.85 13.45 10.11 13.45 13.85 10.11 23.43 9.79 <br />SampleJ3iiance* 32.64 35.89 13.79 35.89 32.64 13.79 47.02 24.88 <br />leSietIIlected <br />Sam 6o so so so 60 ~ FAIL 50 ~ FAIL <br />p PASS FAIL 72 <br />0 72 <br />0 <br />®oledlrtiance 0.57 0.68 0.50 0.50 0.40 0.48 . . <br />ti <br />t* 0 <br />3 562 3.3 s45 3.9820 11.3695 <br />c ( <br />) <br />Calculated t-statis <br />Tabular Value(ort . <br />1.9822 1.9845 1.9822 1.9845 <br />Table E5-4 Bowie -Woody Plant Density - 2006 <br /> Woody Plant Density Summary by Species (per acre) <br /> Sampling Method: 4m x 25m Belt Transacts <br /> New Juniper Old Juniper <br /> Woodland Woodland <br />Species Common Name Growth Form Reference Reference <br />melachier utahensis Serviceberry Shrub 23.5 32.4 <br />rtemisia tridentate var. vvyo. Wyo. Big Sagebrush Shrub 77.7 6.5 <br />tri lax canescens Four-win Saltbush Shrub 29.9 " <br />4 <br />0 <br />Cercocarpus montanus Mountain Mahogany Shrub - . <br />uniperus osteosperma Utah Juniper Tree 397.4 520.4 <br />Mahonia re ens Cree in Barber Shrub - 88.2 <br />Purshia tridentate Antelope Bitterbrush Shrub 0.8 " <br />Quercus gambelii Gambel Oak Tree 49.4 252.5 <br />Rhus aromatics ss . trilobata Skunkbush Shrub 4.9 <br />1 <br />696 <br />582.3 <br />1 <br />S m horicar os rotundifolius Mountain Snowber Shrub . , <br /> Shrub 832.8 1,713.4 <br />Total by G rowth Form Tree 446.8 772.9 <br /> Succulent - - <br /> Total 1,280 2,486 <br /> <br />~IEIIDAI~ (~1~1&AC ~~ffi®CIIA'Il'1&~~ INC. <br />Exhibit 5 -Vegetation Resources <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.