My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-10-21_REVISION - C1980005
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1980005
>
2008-10-21_REVISION - C1980005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:37:19 PM
Creation date
10/21/2008 3:40:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
10/21/2008
Doc Name
Request for Assistance (E-mail)
From
Dan Mathews
To
Mike Boulay
Type & Sequence
TR46
Email Name
DTM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cramer, Johanna <br />From: Mathews, Dan <br />Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 9:52 AM <br />To: Boulay, Mike <br />Cc: Brown, Sandy; Cramer, Johanna <br />Subject: Request for Review Assistance <br />Mike, <br />Per our discussion, I would like to request your review assistance for Seneca II TR-46 (Permanent Stock Pond T-3). This <br />is the Wadge Pasture pond that I noticed during the SL-3 bond release inspection, which is not delineated on the <br />Permanent Features Map or listed in the permit as a permanent impoundment, but which the operator does wish to retain <br />as a permanent stock pond. <br />The application was submitted earlier this month and deemed complete on October 8. 1 would request your review memo <br />by November 14. <br />A couple things I noticed in a cursory review of the submittal: <br />1. The table listing on page 1 of the amended Appendix 13-9 text, immediately folowing the first paragraph, which <br />lists "Stock Ponds to Be Retained As Permanent Structures", appears to have a couple errors. The listing erroneously <br />includes Pond T-9 (not listed elsewhere in text, tables or maps), and does not list Ponds T-8 and T-16 (which are listed in <br />the various other text sections, tables, and maps). The table needs to be corrected. <br />2. There appears to be no commitment to provide required documentation of State Engineer coordination or <br />approval. We may need to have them provide such commitment in the amended text, along with a specific commitment to <br />provide required documentation of acceptable water quality, persistance, landowner request, and any other required <br />demonstrations, prior to final Phase 3 bond release approval. <br />Possibly, these commitments may be included elsewhere in the permit application, you are no doubt more familiar with this <br />issue and what has been approved/required previously at Seneca II for the stock pond demonstrations. <br />Thanks <br />Dan <br />PS. I have copied Johanna on the memo for imaging in the Permit C-1980-005 Revisions File.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.