My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1990-04-27_REPORT - C1980005 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1980005
>
1990-04-27_REPORT - C1980005 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2021 8:21:30 AM
Creation date
10/21/2008 1:04:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
4/27/1990
Doc Name
4th Annual Topsoil and Spoil Monitoring Report 1989 Field Season
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Annual Reclamation Report
Email Name
DTM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' representative revegetation sites. The nitrate analysis will also continue to be <br /> ' determined on water samples collected from Spring BP-0001 and Pond DA-0004; however, the <br /> data will only be presented in the annual Hydrology Monitoring Report. Peabody's revision <br /> request is still pending with the Division. <br /> Wolf Creek Spoil Sampling <br /> Peabody is required to sample and analyze final graded spoil from the Wolf Creek mining <br /> ' area prior to topsoil replacement. Spoil is sampled on a 300 foot horizontal grid and <br /> tested for pH, acid base potential (ABP), manganese (Mn), and soil salinity (EC). A <br /> ' selectively handled suitable spoil topdressing is made prior to topsoil replacement where <br /> acid strata (pH <5 and ABP <-5) are encountered. The monitoring program is outlined on <br /> Pages 6-153, 6-153a, 6-164, and 9-40 of the PAP. <br /> Final graded spoil was described and sampled on September 13-15, 1989 at 29 sites located <br /> ' in the Wolf Creek mining area. Spoil pits were excavated with a backhoe to a depth of 60 <br /> inches to expose the upper spoil horizons. Spoil material was described and sampled to <br /> ' profile depths which exceeded the projected plant rooting zone (about 48 inches). Field <br /> soil properties, including color, rock type, rock fragment content (volumetric), degree of <br /> compaction, and texture, were described by using methods presented in Soil Taxonomy <br /> (USDA-SCS, 1975) and Soil Survey Manual (USDA-SCS, 1951 and 1962) including revised <br /> Chapter 4 - Examination and Description of Soils in the Field (USDA-SCS, June 1981). <br /> Spoil sample increments varied from 1 .0 to 4.0 feet based upon visual differences in <br /> color, texture, rock type, and rock fragment content. The sampled spoil material was <br /> placed in clean, labeled, 4-mil thick polyethylene storage bags and was kept cool and dry <br /> to limit chemical changes. The samples were shipped on September 15 to Inter-Mountain <br /> ' Laboratory (IML) in Farmington, New Mexico for analysis. The soil analyses methods are <br /> listed in Table 2. <br /> ' The location of each spoil pit is presented on the enclosed 1"=400' <br /> scale existing topography map (Exhibit 1 , Topsoil and Spoil Monitoring Map - 1989 Field <br /> Season). Coordinate and elevation data, provided by the Seneca Mine Engineering <br /> Department, and field description data are presented in Table 3. Laboratory results <br /> ' for spoil samples collected from the 29 Wolf Creek mining area backhoe pits are presented <br /> in Table 4. Sixty-five percent of the area had been topdressed (subsoiled) before <br /> sampling. <br /> 3 <br /> PEABODY COAL COMPANY <br /> Western Division <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.