My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-10-16_REVISION - M1980244
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2008-10-16_REVISION - M1980244
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:52:20 PM
Creation date
10/20/2008 10:27:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
10/16/2008
Doc Name
Rationale for Recommendations Over Objections
From
DRMS
To
Parties to Cresson Project Amendment #9 Application.
Type & Sequence
AM9
Email Name
BMK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Additional objection letter(s) received after the comment period ended <br />Park Center Water District 7/9/08 7/19/08 <br />Issues raised by objecting parties that are outside the jurisdiction of the Division <br />1) Noise, 2) Dust, 3) Time of operation, 4) Negative impacts to property value, 5) Impacts to <br />Aesthetics/View shed, 6) Visibility, 7) Light during night operation, 8) Destruction of non registered <br />Historic Sites, 9) Traffic, 10) Loss Of Jobs, 11) Strip Mining Strips History, 12) Long term Commitment <br />from CC&V to maintain the American Eagle over look. <br />Issues raised by the objectors where DBMS has jurisdictional authority <br />Issues raised by the objecting parties are listed below, along with the names of the objectors. The Division's <br />response to objection issues follows. Issues are listed under the application exhibit (application section) to <br />which they pertain. <br />The issues raised by the objecting parties are in bold print. DRMS'S response to the objection issues follows <br />in standard print. References to the Act are from the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act for Hard Rock <br />Metal Mines 34-32-102 et. al.. References to the Rules are from Minerals Rules and Regulations of The <br />Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board for Hard Rock Metal and Designated Operations <br />6.4.4 Exhibit D- Mining Plan <br />1) Blasting Damage to property and structures in Cripple Creek ( Carl Poch, Mr. & Mrs. Raymond and <br />Mr. Dan Baader, Mayor, Cripple Creek) <br />DBMS Response: <br />To date, CC&V has never exceeded the peak particle velocity of 0.5 inches per second set by the Division in <br />accordance with the Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Enforcement's Blasting Guidance Manual <br />and approved by the Mined Land Reclamation Board. <br />The Division has scrutinized the information submitted both within the amendment application and by the <br />commentors. The Division believes CC&V has adequately demonstrated past blast monitoring compliance <br />within the City of Victor through appropriate blasting, vibration, geotechnical, and structural analyses. <br />These analyses demonstrate that off-site areas will not be adversely impacted by placing seismograph <br />monitoring points as approved by the DRMS. In addition, in the Cripple Creek area that has not affected by <br />the past mining activities, CC&V will conduct a pre-blast survey of structures that could potentially be <br />affected. Pre-blast surveys will be conducted at all structures located within one-half mile of the proposed <br />blasting area unless persons in ownership or control deny access to the structures. Requests to conduct pre- <br />blast surveys will be sent to owners of record of these structures a minimum of 30 days prior to initiating <br />blasting with in one-half mile. CC&V will provide the plan to the DRMS for review and approval prior to <br />conducting the survey. CC&V has proposed to place one additional seismograph for monitoring of <br />potential impacts to structures in Cripple Creek. The location of the new seismograph will be established <br />prior to the MLRB's decision on Amendment # 9 and be at the closest structure to include the Molly <br />Kathleen underground mine. <br />2) Noise from Blasting (Carl Poch, Dan Baader and Joan Harris)
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.