2008-07-25_PERMIT FILE - C1981010A ‎(2)‎

• Permit No: C1981010A
• IBM Index Class Name: Permit File
• Doc Date: 7/25/2008
• Doc Name: pages 2-58 to 2-169
• Section_Exhibit Name: 2.3 Vegetation & 2.4 Fish and Wildlife
• Media Type: D
• Archive: Yes

Table 2.3-10. Caparison of production sanple rteans frao each range site within a vegetation type bawd
m 1979 data [o detennire if uniq~~ populations exist.
•
Fsti- Differ
Statdard mate ence [ cal- [Test
Vegetation deviation of Mean (d) culated star @ Conclusion (Accept,
type n (s) (X)(1) Xi - Xj (2) = 0.05(3) Reject) (4)
Mountain shrub
Ratge site 1 16 63.7
V; 2302.48 11.7
Range site 2 16 75.4
Range site 1 16 63.7
VS 935.41 28.3
Range site 3 16 35.4
Range site 2
Range site 3
Sagebrush-grass
Range site 4 27 48.6
V; 1,228.94 7.7
Range site 5 27 40.9
Canrot reject the toll hy-
9778 2.131 pothesis, that 1 and 2 are
equal at the .05 level of
statistical confidence.
Reject the null hypothesis
3.7012 2.131 that 1 and 3 are equal
at the .OS level of
statistical confidence.
Reject that 2 and 3 are
equal based on a canpari~n
of the means arcs at the [w
previous calculations.
Canna reject the toll hy-
1.1393 2.056 pothesis, that 4 and 5 are
equal at the .OS level of
statistical confidence.
(1) 2 ~dK - (lL dK)2 wttere: sd = Tne vaziance of the irciividual differences betteen
s = n the ith atd jth groups.
d n-1 dk = The square of the itdividual differences between
the ith arcs jth groups.
n =The nmber of pairs of plots sampled.
(2) t = R. -
n
sd
n
(3) From Freese, 1967.
there: X. = Tne mean of Xi.
X. = Tne ~an of X..
J J
(4) Null Hypothesis: ~1 = ~2 Alternate }Iypothesis: ~I # ~2
~1-~3 ~1~~3
`. u
~4 -~ 5 4 #~ 5
2-96