My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-10-09_INSPECTION - M1990140
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Minerals
>
M1990140
>
2008-10-09_INSPECTION - M1990140
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:37:00 PM
Creation date
10/15/2008 2:04:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1990140
IBM Index Class Name
INSPECTION
Doc Date
10/9/2008
Doc Name
Inspection report
From
DRMS
To
Duran & Pearce Contractors, Inc.
Inspection Date
9/30/2008
Email Name
GRM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(Page 2) <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID #: M-1990-140 <br />INSPECTION DATE: 9-30-08 INSPECTOR'S INITIALS GRM <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />This inspection was conducted as part of the Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety nonnal <br />monitoring program. The Martin Pit is located south of Craig South Highlands on 107 Road. The Martin Pit is a <br />110c permitted site. The permitee Jim Duran was contacted to schedule the inspection. Attempts to contact Mr. <br />Duran the day of the inspection were unsuccessful but he did leave the gate open as arraigned. <br />The mine identification sign and affected area boundary markers are in place and in compliance with Rule 3.1.12. <br />The sign is located at the entrance to the site at the top of the hill. Permit boundaries were noted as t-posts at key <br />corners with the exception of the southwestern point. <br />Evidence of recent activities include fresh excavation in the south pit area, dumped materials along a small high wall <br />area in the northwest and recently buried materials in the pit area. No stockpiled excavation materials were <br />observed. An excavator was the only piece of equipment on site. No fuel tanks or other petroleum products were <br />noted on site. The site appears to be being excavated for particular materials from several different areas within the <br />permit boundaries. <br />The 2007 Annual Report map notes approximately a third of the site is reclaimed. The inspector's observations note <br />that the slopes in this area are approximately 3:1. Access roads to the upper bench and lower presently mined areas <br />traverse this area. Revegetation of positive species appears to be primarily slender wheatgrass and some type of <br />natural aster. The predominant vegetation however is annual weeds such as Russian thistle and similar species. At <br />this point revegetation success appears to be very marginal. <br />A noxious and/or problematic weed infestation (Canadian or musk thistle) was observed within the affected area. <br />Per Rule 3.1.10 (6) methods of weed control shall be employed for all prohibited noxious weed species. The <br />infestation, if not controlled, will most likely hinder and/or delay successful reclamation of this site and contribute to <br />off-site spreading and establishment of these weeds. A weed control plan developed in consultation with, and <br />approved by, the appropriate local weed control authority must be submitted as a technical revision to this permit. <br />Please note that by policy this site is considered a source for the thistle infestation. The inspector noted no <br />infestations along the immediate boundaries to the permitted area. This requires much more rigorous control than if <br />the site were a sink. Significant progress toward control of on-site weeds must be demonstrated within three years to <br />avoid potential Board action. Any release requests in the future may be impacted by the failure to control the <br />noxious weeds. Weed infestation is noted as a problem with the corrective action(s) and correction date specified <br />on the last page of this report. <br />Topsoil and overburden are being stockpiled along the north edge. Rule 3.1.9 requires topsoil have: "protection <br />from erosion, remains free of any contamination by toxic or acid-forming material, and is in a usable condition for <br />reclamation." Side slopes of the stockpiles were observed to be devoid of any erosion control measures. Trash was <br />noted as being dumped in the topsoil area as well and need to be removed. If the stockpiles are to remain in place <br />for longer than a year, vegetative cover such as a nurse or cover crop should be used. Staff recommends using the <br />same seed mix and application rates that will be used in final reclamation. However, the approved mine plan notes <br />that topsoil stockpiles will be seeded with western wheatgrass. Inadequate erosion control for topsoil is noted as a <br />problem with the corrective action(s) and correction date specified on the last page of this report.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.