My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-09-29_ENFORCEMENT - C1981035
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Coal
>
C1981035
>
2008-09-29_ENFORCEMENT - C1981035
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:36:39 PM
Creation date
10/6/2008 1:41:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035
IBM Index Class Name
ENFORCEMENT
Doc Date
9/29/2008
Doc Name
Settlement Agreement (King I and II)
From
DRMS
To
GCC Energy, LLC
Violation No.
CV2008002
Email Name
TAK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
After hearing this testimony and considering the evidence presented, I have come to the <br />following conclusions: <br />History <br />A $0.00 penalty is appropriate for history. <br />Seriousness <br />I believe that a violation did occur and the seriousness component of the violation was <br />properly assessed. Although the operator failed to follow their approved mine plan and <br />clearly mined outside the boundaries set forth in that plan, no actual damage occurred as <br />the result of those actions. However, evaluations of potential impacts are based on a <br />review of the plan that is submitted and approved. Deviations from those approved plans <br />could lead to damage that was not anticipated or properly evaluated. Therefore, the <br />seriousness component shall stand as assessed at $250.00. <br />Fault <br />The operator knowingly mined outside of their approved mine plan area. This was <br />clearly shown on the approved versus actual mine workings map. The operator did <br />indicate that they felt that they were in the approved affected area, however, evaluations <br />of possible impacts due to underground workings are based on specific plans that are <br />reviewed and approved. Deviations from those approved plans can lead to unanticipated <br />impacts and any such change should be submitted as a revision to the approved permit <br />application in order to fully evaluate those potential impacts. Therefore, the fault <br />component shall stand as assessed at $500.00. <br />Number of Days of Penalty Assessed <br />I concur with 1 day. <br />Good Faith <br />The NOV has been fully abated as required by abatement steps 1 & 2 through the <br />submittal and approval of TR-14. However, as this step was completed prior to the <br />penalty assessment, good faith was already granted during that process. Therefore, no <br />additional good faith reduction is warranted and original $250.00 will stand. <br />Settlement Agreement Penalty <br />History $0.00 <br />Seriousness (moderate) $250.00 <br />Fault (unavoidable) $500.00 <br />Number of Days 1 <br />Gnnrl Faith $_250.00 <br />Total Penalty $500.00
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.