My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-09-29_REVISION - C1981019 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2008-09-29_REVISION - C1981019 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:36:43 PM
Creation date
9/29/2008 1:57:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
9/29/2008
Doc Name
Preliminary Adequacy Review
From
DRMS
To
Colowyo Coal Company
Type & Sequence
TR74
Email Name
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
samples represent the significant majority of the compacted fill." This statement <br />is at odds with the test results reported in Attachment A3. Of 14 compaction tests <br />taken above the keyway, 1 test referred to 7P; 7 tests referenced 8P, and 6 tests <br />were compared with 11 P <br />Neither P9 nor P10 were ever used for evaluation of fill placement. Please <br />revise the text of the Construction Report to be consistent with the <br />information presented elsewhere in the report. <br />17) The second paragraph on Page 2 should refer to Attachment "A2" rather <br />than "2". Please correct this error. <br />18) The last line of Page 2 should refer to Attachment "Al" rather than 111". <br />Please correct this error. <br />19) The third paragraph of Page 3 should refer to Attachment 11A2" rather than <br />"2". Neither does the paragraph mention sample Pll. Please correct these <br />errors. <br />20) According to the first paragraph on Page 4, the approved 24-inch flume was <br />replaced by a 9-inch version. <br />Please provide the Division with design calculations which illustrate that a 9- <br />inch flume is sufficient to carry the flow expected from dewatering the pond <br />through the 18-inch CMP that has been installed. <br />21) Attachment AM does not include a data point classifying Sample No. 11P. <br />Please amend the chart to include 11P. <br />22) Attachment A2 includes Proctor Test Results for Sample Nos. 5P and 6P, the <br />source of which was never utilized for the project, but no such data is provided for <br />Sample No. 11 P. <br />Please include the Proctor Test Results for Sample No. 11P in Attachment <br />A2. <br />23) In Attachment A3, pages -8, -10, -12 and -14, the Depth / Elev column refers to <br />"BTE", but this term is not defined in the Comments section at the bottom of the <br />page. <br />Please amend the key to provide the interpretation for the abbreviation BTE. <br />24) Attachment A3-14 included "ATP" in the Depth / Elev column. <br />Please amend the key to provide the interpretation for the abbreviation ATP.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.