My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-08-20_REVISION - C1980004 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1980004
>
2008-08-20_REVISION - C1980004 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:35:39 PM
Creation date
9/22/2008 1:16:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980004
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
8/20/2008
Doc Name
Adequacy Review
From
J.E. Stover & Associates, Inc
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR16
Email Name
MPB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mike Boulay -3- August 19, 2008 <br />13. DRMS: The Division requested further narrative, location, and design <br />information addressing Light Use Roads #1, #2, and #3, as well as a narrative <br />status update regarding the reclaimed light use road constructed in 2005 along <br />the North Fork of Munger Creek to a remote drill site. Updated narrative was <br />provided on amended page 2-32. Light Use Roads #1 and #2 are depicted and <br />labeled on amended Map Figure 2.2-2, however Light Use Road #3 is <br />(apparently erroneously) not depicted or labeled on the map figure. <br />Please provide amended map Figure 2.2-2, with Light Use Road #3 depicted <br />and labeled. <br />CAM: Light use Road #3 is shown on amended Figure 2.2-2. <br />Rule 2.05.3(4) Ponds, Impoundments, Other Treatment Facilities and <br />Diversions <br />14. Item Resolved. <br />15. Item Resolved. <br />16. DRMS: The Division concurs that the new sediment pond embankment is <br />not a Class B or C dam and failure will not cause serious property damage or <br />loss of life. However, a stability analysis is required for all impoundment <br />embankments. In accordance with 4.05.9(8)(b), any impoundment not meeting <br />the size or other criteria of 30 CFR 77.216(a), and located where failure would <br />not be expected to cause loss of life or serious property damage, shall have a <br />minimum static safety factor of 1.3 for a normal pool with steady state seepage <br />saturation conditions. <br />Please provide a stability analysis for the proposed new impoundment that <br />demonstrates compliance with 4.05.9(8)(b). <br />CAM: Attached as Appendix S are stability analyses demonstrating compliance <br />with Rule 4.05.9(8)(b). <br />17. Item Resolved. <br />18. Item resolved. <br />19. DRMS: it is still unclear how the new sediment pond will be operated <br />(manually versus passively discharged). The revised SEDCAD demonstration <br />shows that the pond will discharge through the primary spillway during the 10- <br />year, 24-hour precipitation event. Yet the operator has indicated in their response <br />to Item 20 below that the pond is designed to contain the 10-year event. <br />The Elevation-Capacity-Discharge Table provided for the 10-year event does not <br />show the top of sediment storage elevation. There is also no Structure Summary <br />provided showing the peak settleable solid concentration out of the pond, which
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.