Laserfiche WebLink
?S. DR requested clari?icatxon regarding In,t?rlln coal n?lne ?raste disposal <br />drainage measures and dlverslon speclficatlans. The operator adequately <br />addressed the concerns within revised language on amended page 2-2111, <br />indicating that any necessary interim ditches would be constructed according to <br />Anal ditch speCl?lGatlons? stern Resolved. <br />3G. The DIV?s1on requested clarification 1th1n ectlons 3.? and ?. of the application <br />to address additional detail pertaining to soil salvage and replacement. Amended <br />language vas pxovided an xevised pages -$ and 3-, but there are ?ernalning <br />discrepancies that need to be cleared up. <br />Topsail Removal and taxage narrative in amended section 3.2 address proposed <br />salvage and stockpiling associated with the ?'?-1 disturbances, but description of <br />previous topsoil salvage operations i lacking. Topsoil Placement narrative in <br />amended section 3.3 indicates that floe office area vas disturbed "pre?law", and <br />that na topsail vas salvaged prior to af?ice area disturbance. statements that the <br />office area was disturbed "pre-law" ?i.e. pxlor to August ?,1977}, conflict with <br />information presented in ectian 2.2.1 ofthe application, ?vhlch state that the <br />aff?lce site ?apprax?in?ately ?l acre} vas disturbed in 1959, and that "topsail was <br />salvaged to a depth of up to 24 inches and placed upon the topsoil stockpile...". <br />Please revise narrativc in amended section 3.2 to comprehensively describe <br />salvage operations and quaaatities conducted to date, s well as projected <br />salvage aperat?ons and quantities associated with TR-?.?, Also, please <br />address the internal incansisten.cy regarding office area topsoil salvage, and <br />revYSe the wording of amended eetian .3 accordingly, with respect to <br />planned topsoil replacerr?ent depths. Assurrun that topsoil was salvaged <br />from the office area as described in section ?.2.?.? sail replacement thickness <br />in the office area portion of the A??' should be causistent with that far the <br />new sediment pond portion of the AVM`. <br />44. The Division requested removal of the cClane to ll?unger road which is na <br />longer appraved? from inap figure 3.1- ? . The map was amended as requested. <br />Item Resolved, <br />??]. The D1v1s1oxi requested narrative clarlflcatlans ?Vltll respect tD lntenm <br />stabil?zatlan seeding plans and seedml?, .Appropriate narrative sections were <br />properly updated. Xtem Resolved. <br />49 ? The Division requested additional narrative clarification and Inap detail regarding <br />proposed fencing installation and rnadiflcations for protection ofnewly reclaimed <br />areas from livestock grazing, Appropriate revisions were made to nalTatlve page <br />? ? 1 ? and neap Figure ? ? 1-1. Xtem Resolved. <br />a. The DIV1s1on requested a copy ofthe Air Enalsslan Pei?nit application pertinent to <br />TR-1 proposed activity, far 1nC1US10n 1n Appendix E. 'The cover letter lterri <br />2