My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-09-17_REVISION - M1980244 (28)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2008-09-17_REVISION - M1980244 (28)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:52:18 PM
Creation date
9/19/2008 7:43:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
9/17/2008
Doc Name
Response to Adequacy Review
From
CC&V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM9
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
level for the wettest years? Does CC&V plan to install additional piezometers to monitor <br />• water level elevation in the riparian areas? Please explain. <br />Response: <br />CC&V believes two different matters are being raised by DRMS and provides the following <br />responses. First, DBMS is correct that CC&V has in place a pumpback system in Arequa <br />Gulch and augments that pumped water as well as water captured by the VLF under a duly <br />authorized augmentation plan. CC&V will update that augmentation plan as Phase 5 of the <br />VLF is brought on line and precipitation from the area is captured. This is an operational <br />augmentation, in that once the VLF is closed, the liner would be punctured and the alluvial <br />recharge in Arequa Gulch would be re-established. <br />Second, as discussed above, CC&V has conducted an extensive investigation of Grassy Valley <br />and has determined that the proposed mining activities would not impact the hydrologic <br />regime. Moreover, the correlation of the water level in the shallow piezometers in the Grassy <br />Valley riparian area with the water levels in the Grassy Valley monitoring wells is illustrated <br />in Figure 8 included as Attachment 8. The water level in PZ-3 is contrasted with the water <br />levels in two bedrock wells: GVMW-5A (about 150 feet below ground surface) and GVMW- <br />8A (about 350 feet below ground surface). <br />The plot shows that the three wells operate synchronously: when water levels are high in the <br />alluvium that water levels are also high in the bedrock. This is consistent with the behavioral <br />concept stated above, that water is supplied to the bedrock through the alluvium. It is also <br />• provided to the bedrock by infiltration over the rest of the Grassy Valley catchment. <br />Numerous piezometers and shallow monitor wells have been installed in Grassy Valley. The <br />water levels in the alluvium piezometers are measured by pressure transducers connected to <br />dataloggers. The monitor well water levels are measured quarterly, but more recently also <br />have pressure transducers and dataloggers installed. Figure 1 included as Attachment No. 9 <br />shows the close temporal correlation between the P2 piezometer peaks (infiltration of surface <br />water and saturation of alluvium) and selected shallow monitor well peaks (infiltration and <br />saturation of shallow bedrock). The recent pressure transducer data for GVMW-1Band P2 <br />for 2007 and 2008 also show the close correlation. The data between the alluvium piezometers <br />and the monitor wells correlate well for all seasons, wet or dry. <br />CC&V does not plan to install additional piezometers to monitor water level elevation in the <br />riparian areas. The four piezometers that are currently installed in the riparian areas are <br />correctly located to identify potential impacts from CC&V's proposed mining activities on the <br />riparian areas. The piezometers are located on the upper reaches of the riparian areas, which is <br />where the reduction in Grassy Creek stream flow is predicted to occur, if at all. They provide <br />monitoring of the potentially most affected locations in the riparian areas, and are therefore <br />conservative. <br />G. How come the water quality data from the DRMS compliance well labeled GVM-8A, is <br />slightly different from those ground water monitoring wells and other monitoring and <br />• compliance wells located within the diatreme? Please explain <br />Response. <br />4 <br />1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.