My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-09-15_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980001
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1980001
>
2008-09-15_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:36:15 PM
Creation date
9/16/2008 3:20:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
9/15/2008
Doc Name
2005 & 2006 Draft Vegetation Reports
From
WWCengineering
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Vegetation
Email Name
JDM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2006 Edna Mine Vegetation Sampling Report <br />mine disturbance. The oak mountain shrub vegetation community represents 17% of the pre- <br />mine disturbance. Appropriate vegetation parameters for each reclaimed unit were compared to <br />the reference areas' weighted mean herbaceous cover and production values. <br />1.3. Summarized Results <br />Results of the vegetation sampling in 2006 are summarized below in Table 1-2. West Ridge <br />Topsoiled BRU and Moffat Topsoiled BRU met or exceeded the appropriate Bonded Reclaimed <br />Areas & Vegetation Performance Standards. However, West Ridge BRU: No-Topsoil and Moffat <br />BRU: No-Topsoil, which were combined for sampling purposes as detailed in the sampling plan, <br />did not meet the appropriate Bonded Reclaimed Areas & Vegetation Performance Standards. <br />The non-topsoiled areas exceeded the standard set by the reference areas, but these two areas <br />were held to a different performance standard of 47% vegetation cover. Shrub density exceeded <br />the Bonded Reclaimed Areas & Vegetation Performance Standards in 2005 and therefore it was <br />unnecessary to sample it again in 2006. <br />Table 1-2: 2006 Edna Mine Vegetation Results <br />Sampling West Ridge <br />Parameter Topsoiled BRU <br /> Standard 24.1 <br />Cover 2006 Mean 40.0 <br />(%) Standard Passed YF '-- ,. <br /> Standard 41\7- <br />Production <br />Production <br />2 <br />2006 Mean <br />149.1 a, <br />(g/m <br />) Standard Passed ` YES <br /> Mil- SpeciE <br /> Standard bet, 4G: o <br /> l: G»po,._,ce <br />Diversity <br />Top-soiled' <br />y-_ <br />39.7 <br />:%185.2 <br />YES <br />Min 5 Species <br />between 3 & 40% <br />Rel. Importance <br />West Ridge BRU <br />& Moffat BRU: <br />No-Topsoi12 <br />47.0 <br />30.5 <br />NO <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />X90% graminoids3 <br />5% forbs3 <br />5% trees/shrubs3 <br />J6 Value Species 7 YES Species YES <br />Detailed results for the snowberry sage and oak mountain shrub reference areas, West Ridge <br />Topsoiled BRU, Moffat Topsoiled BRU, and the West Ridge & Moffat Non-Topsoiled BRUs are <br />provided in Sections 2 through 5. These sections include statistical analysis of the data <br />collected, photographs, and maps of transect locations. <br />passe ? YES <br />Standai.?' <br />Cover values are herbaceous ? ,Jr <br />2 Cover values are total vegetation cover <br />3 Voluntary Standard <br /> <br />42.7% graminoid <br />50.5% forbs <br />6.8%trees/shrubs <br />Habitat Management, Inc. 2 October 19, 2006
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.