My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-09-08_REVISION - M1980244
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2008-09-08_REVISION - M1980244
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:52:17 PM
Creation date
9/9/2008 9:24:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
9/8/2008
Doc Name
Review Comments
From
Dirk J.A. vanZyl, P.E., Ph.D
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM9
Email Name
BMK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
For the composite liner system the reported test results (some of these <br />results were verbally reported by John Lupo during our meeting) show <br />that the geomembrane performed well until a normal stress equivalent to <br />a height of 1,020 feet. At an equivalent height of 1,040 feet some <br />punctures were observed and there was significant particle crushing. The <br />height of 800 feet therefore allows a significant safety margin. <br />The maximum and average depths of ore placement above the PSSAs for <br />the Phase 5 expansion are listed in the table below (information provided <br />by John Lupo): <br />PSSA Maximum Ore <br />Heigh t feet Average Ore <br />Height feet Comments <br />Phase I 550 420 No change <br />Phase II 450 220 No change <br />Phase IV 700 440 Onl chan e <br />For the PSSA liner system testing was carried out to a normal load <br />equivalent to 880 feet of ore and the geomembrane did not puncture. It <br />therefore also allows a significant safety margin. <br />An important aspect of the puncturing behavior of the liner is the <br />condition of the foundation underlying the liner system. To prevent <br />puncturing it is essential to have a firm foundation below the compacted <br />clay liner that will not settle. The whole pad area of the VLF is underlain <br />by firm materials so that foundation settlement is not an issue. <br />One other aspect that was evaluated during the review is the slope of the <br />foundation in the area where the heap height is 800 feet. If the slope is <br />steep then small movements may occur along the liner interface as a <br />result of the compression of heap materials. In the worst case such small <br />movements may result in striations of various depths on the <br />geomembrane layer and under the best case the material will slide along <br />the interface. The latter is the most probable scenario as this behavior is <br />observed in shearbox tests at high normal stresses. <br />Considering the isopach information on Figure 3 of the AMEC report as <br />well as the foundation grading of the VLF (refer to Dwg 4 of the Phase IV <br />Design by Golder Associates, April 2000), the high heap heights will be <br />directly above areas where the slope of the foundation is either almost flat <br />or in the order of 3.5:1. It is therefore concluded that the foundation <br />slope will not affect the integrity of the geomembrane liner under the high <br />heap. <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.