Laserfiche WebLink
III. COMMENTS - COMPLIANCE <br /> Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations <br /> made during the inspection. Comments in Section IV describe any enforcement actions <br /> taken during the inspection and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br /> Page 1/1 North Thompson Creek C-81-025 <br /> 12 August 2008 <br /> This was a complete inspection of the North Thompson Creek Mine conducted on 12 August 2008 by <br /> Jim Stark of CDRMS. The mine has been reclaimed and the operator has applied for a final Phase III <br /> Bond Release (a termination of jurisdiction for the site). The Division is still considering this <br /> application. The weather was hot and sunny and the ground was dry. <br /> Availability of records: All of the necessary records were available at the Garfield County <br /> Courthouse in Glenwood Springs. See the records checklist at the end of this inspection for more <br /> details. <br /> Signs and Markers: - All of the mine Id signs were in place. This included the portal 1 and portal 3 <br /> areas. <br /> Roads: - The access road to the treatment ponds was in good condition and appeared to be stable at the <br /> time of the inspection. The road is becoming overgrown with grasses due to lack of use. <br /> - The mine entrance road was stable and in good condition at the time of the inspection. No erosional <br /> problems were noted on the road <br /> Hydrologic Balance: - The long pond was in good condition and appeared to be stable at the time of <br /> the inspection. Both the #1 and the#3 portal were discharging at the time of the inspection. There was <br /> a large amount of staining at the pond but it appeared to be doing its job. <br /> - The two treatment ponds (T1 and T2)were both full at the time of the inspection. T1 was <br /> discharging to T2 and T2 was discharging to the river. There discharge was clear and there was no <br /> iron staining on the rocks at the discharge point. The pond embankments were stable and well <br /> vegetated and there were no erosional problems noted. <br /> - Sediment pond P9 contained a small amount of water from T2 but was not discharging at the time of <br /> the inspection. The pond embankment was well vegetated and appeared to be stable. No erosional <br /> problems were noted on the embankment. <br /> Backfilling and Grading: - The sinkhole at the#3 portal appears to be stable. The vegetation <br /> growing on the sinkhole has completely covered the area so that there is no visible sign that it existed. <br /> - The backfilled#1 portal remained stable and well vegetated at the time of the inspection. No <br /> cracking or settling was noticed. <br /> Processing Waste: - The refuse pile appeared to be stable at the time of the inspection. The pile was <br /> well vegetated and no erosional problems were noted. The two small holes/depressions that appeared <br /> in the refuse were not visible at the time of the inspection. <br />