My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-08-28_REPORT - C1980007
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2008-08-28_REPORT - C1980007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:35:54 PM
Creation date
9/4/2008 2:30:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
8/28/2008
Doc Name
2008 Subsidence and Geologic Field Observations
From
WWE Wright Water Engineers, Inc
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Subsidence Report
Email Name
TAK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Spring 2008 Subsidence and Geologic Field Observations <br />Box Canyon, Apache Rocks, and South of Divide Mining Areas <br />is The overburden depth to the B-seam ranges between 1,625 and 2,175 feet. Observed subsidence <br />related features along this traverse included a crack at Location 3 and a rockfall at Location 4 <br />(Map 1). <br />5.4.1 Location 3 <br />A subsidence crack is located primarily in soil and colluvium in and above the roadcut (Figure <br />10). The crack trends roughly parallel to the long direction of mined Longwall Panel 14 near the <br />headgate entries. At this location, the exposed crack in the sandstone bedrock decreases in width <br />downward from approximately 0.25-inch to a hairline over a vertical distance of about 3.5 feet. <br />The crack trend is approximately N70°W for a distance of about 50 feet upslope and changes to a <br />N55°W trend over the next 100 feet or more. Where this crack occurs in the soil and colluvium <br />above the exposed bedrock, it appears to be 6 to 12 inches wide with a depth of as much as 12 to <br />24 inches. Considerable sandy material was observed in and around the crack trace, suggesting <br />heavy runoff had occurred in this area, thus contributing to the erosion and widening along this <br />crack trace. <br />A photographic comparison to the spring 2007 photograph at this location shows there to be <br />minimal observable differences (see Figure 6 of that report). <br />• 831-032.790 Wright Water Engineers, Inc. Page 21 <br />August 2008
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.