My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-08-28_ENFORCEMENT - M1983194
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Minerals
>
M1983194
>
2008-08-28_ENFORCEMENT - M1983194
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:35:54 PM
Creation date
9/3/2008 7:48:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1983194
IBM Index Class Name
ENFORCEMENT
Doc Date
8/28/2008
Doc Name
EPA issues violation
From
United States Environmental Protection Agency
To
Natural Soda, Inc.
Email Name
SSS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I packer or tubing (also called "internal" mechanical integrity, 40 C.F.R. § <br />2 146.8(a)(1)), and there is no significant fluid movement into USDWs through <br />3 vertical channels adjacent to the well bore (also called "external" mechanical <br />4 integrity, 40 C.F.R. § 146.8(a)(2)). <br />5 <br />6 19. Part II(C)(6) of the UIC permit requires Respondent to demonstrate mechanical <br />7 integrity through the following methods: a pressure test, for "internal" mechanical <br />8 integrity, and [use of] temperature logs for "external" mechanical integrity. <br />9 <br />10 20. Respondent demonstrated internal and external mechanical integrity at the wells <br />11 referenced in paragraph 9 in 2002, and was required to demonstrate mechanical <br />12 integrity again in 2007, as follows: <br />13 <br />Well <br />name Mechanical Integrity <br />Demonstration Method Demonstration Date Demonstration Due <br />Date <br />5H Pressure test May 9, 2002 May 9, 2007 <br />5H Temperature log June 4, 2002 June 4, 2007 <br />6H Pressure test September 29, 2002 September 29, 2007 <br />6H Temperature log October 21, 2002 October 21, 2007 <br />14 <br />15 21. See Attachment A to this complaint where these violations are summarized and <br />16 labeled with the letters "A" and "B." Attachment A is incorporated into this <br />17 - complaint. <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />COUNT 1 <br />22. Respondent is in violation of part II(C)(6) of its UIC permit and 40 C.F.R. § <br />146.33(b)(3), by failing to demonstrate mechanical integrity at least once every <br />five years for Well 5H and Well 6H. The duration of the Respondent's violation <br />is shown in detail in attachment A. EPA has not received the mechanical integrity <br />demonstrations. For the purpose of determining a total duration of non- <br />compliance, EPA estimates that such compliance will have occurred by <br />September 30, 2008. <br />PROPOSED ORDER WITH ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL PENALTY <br />23. The Act, as amended, and 40 C.F.R. part 19, authorize the assessment of a civil <br />penalty of up to $11,000 for each day of violation up to a maximum penalty of <br />$157,500. 42 U.S.C. § 300h-2(c)(2). The Act requires EPA to take into account <br />the following factors in assessing a civil penalty: the seriousness of the violations, <br />the economic benefit resulting from the violations, Respondent's prior compliance <br />history of such violations, any good-faith efforts to comply, the economic impact <br />on Respondent, and other factors that justice may require. 42 U.S.C. § 300h- <br />2(c)(4)(B)• <br />Page 4 of 9
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.