Laserfiche WebLink
Gary Isaac <br />CAM-Colorado, LLC <br />August 29, 2008 <br />Page 9 <br />The potential exists for surface disturbances, waste pile leachate, and mine water <br />discharge to eventually impact the East Salt Creek alluvium. The potential impacts and <br />the probable hydrologic consequences cannot be determined without adequate baseline <br />characterization of the East Salt Creek alluvium. At least one well in the adjacent area <br />along East Salt Creek is permitted for domestic use and future domestic and agricultural <br />use of the water is reasonably probable. There is no discussion of East Salt Creek <br />alluvium baseline water quality or quantity provided in the PAP. <br />The Division is concerned that the alluvial groundwater in the vicinity of East Salt Creek <br />has not been adequately characterized and the required baseline data have not been <br />provided. In accordance with Rule 2.04.7 please amend the application to include a <br />description of the quantity and quality of groundwater within the East Salt creek <br />Alluvium. Please provide baseline groundwater monitoring data for the East Salt Creek <br />alluvium. If data have not already been established, then incorporate a plan for additional <br />groundwater monitoring wells within the East Salt Creek alluvium and obtain both water <br />quantity (hydraulic properties) and quality information. The Division recommends at <br />least three additional monitoring points be established. Two should be located along East <br />Salt Creek within the saturated alluvium (one up gradient and one down gradient) from <br />the point where mine discharge may potentially enter the stream. One additional <br />monitoring well should be located along the stream/mine water flow path downstream of <br />the major disturbance areas. <br />25. On page 2.04-19, CAM states that the applicant drilled eleven geotechnical holes within <br />the permit area and nine of the holes were dry. This is not consistent with information <br />provided elsewhere in the PAP. The plan view shown on Map 8 indicates numerous <br />exploration holes were drilled within the permit boundary and at least three of these were <br />converted to bedrock monitoring wells (8-2-8, 8-3-10, and 7-34-7). Please clarify this <br />discrepancy and revise page 2.04-19, if appropriate. <br />26. The lithologic logs for eight of the geotechnical holes drilled within the permit area are <br />provided on Map 8 Cross Section A-A'. It would be helpful to have the logs of all drill <br />holes and test borings showing the lithologic characteristics, physical properties and <br />thickness of each stratum which may be impacted incorporated into the PAP. Please <br />provide the logs for all drill holes and test borings drilled within the permit area and <br />include them as an exhibit in Volume III of the PAP. <br />27. Please provide the lithologic logs for the bedrock groundwater monitoring wells (7-34-7, <br />8-2-8, and 8-3-10) and include them with the well completion diagrams in Volume III, <br />Exhibit 3. <br />28. The Division notes an inconsistency between the information presented in the Draft <br />Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) versus the PAP with regard to the data