My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-08-29_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2008086
>
2008-08-29_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:35:56 PM
Creation date
9/2/2008 2:26:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2008086
IBM Index Class Name
APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE
Doc Date
8/29/2008
Doc Name
Preliminary Adequacy Review Letter
From
DRMS
To
CAM-Colorado, LLC
Email Name
MPB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Gary Isaac <br />CAM-Colorado, LLC <br />August 29, 2008 <br />Page 17 <br />43. The hydrology designs found in Volume IV use 1.4 inches as the 10 year-24 hour <br />precipitation event, 1.8 inches as the 25 year-24 hour event and 2.2 inches as the 100 <br />year-24 hour event. However, examination of the 1973 NOAA Atlas "Precipitation - <br />Frequency Atlas of the Western United States" shows larger precipitation values. The <br />NOAA Atlas values are about 1.7 inches, 2.05 inches and 2.6 inches respectively. Also, <br />the hydrology designs for the McClane Mine just to the north used 1.7 inches as the 10 <br />year-24 hour precipitation event. Please explain CAM's values or revise the Sedcad <br />designs appropriately. <br />44. There are several examples of soil types shown on Map-04 not coinciding with soil types <br />used in the curve number determinations in Volume IV for the various drainage areas. <br />Most of the differences do not have an effect on the curve number determination but, in <br />order to avoid any future confusion, the Division believes appropriate changes should be <br />made. <br />A. In the Sedcad design for pond A, on pages A-3, A-4 and A-5, soil types of loam, <br />Persayo Sandy Loam and Avalon Sandy Loam are used. However, examination of <br />Map-04, "Soils", shows that there are only rock outcrops in the area draining to <br />pond A. Please explain the use of these soil types in the hydrology designs or <br />make changes to the Sedcad designs to reflect the soils on Map 04. <br />B. Concerning pond G, on page G-3 of Volume III, a soil type of Persayo Sandy <br />Loam is used for the salt desert shrub curve number determination. However, <br />referring to Map-04, Soils, there does not appear to be any such soil type in the <br />drainage area for pond G. Please explain the use of these soil types in the <br />hydrology designs or make changes to the Sedcad designs to reflect the soils on <br />Map 04. <br />C. In the hydrology designs for pond G on pages G-3 and G-4, there are no soil types <br />of torriorthents, Chipeta Silty Clay or rock outcrop used for any of the curve <br />number determinations, even though those soil types appear in the pond G <br />drainage on Map-04. Please explain the use of these soil types in the hydrology <br />designs or make changes to the Sedcad designs to reflect the soils on Map 04. <br />D. In the hydrology designs for pond C on pages C-3, C-4 and C-5, the soil types <br />used in the curve number determinations do not appear to match the soil types <br />shown on Map-04 for the pond C drainage area. In one case, the soil type is listed <br />as being Persayo Sandy Loam but there does not appear to be any such soil type <br />shown on Map-04 for the pond C drainage area. Also, soil types of Chipeta Silty <br />Clay, Chipeta Clay, torriorthents and Aga Very Gravelly Loam appear on Map-04 <br />within the pond C drainage but do not appear in any of the curve number <br />determinations for pond C. Please explain the use of these soil types in the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.