My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-08-29_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2008086
>
2008-08-29_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:35:56 PM
Creation date
9/2/2008 2:26:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2008086
IBM Index Class Name
APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE
Doc Date
8/29/2008
Doc Name
Preliminary Adequacy Review Letter
From
DRMS
To
CAM-Colorado, LLC
Email Name
MPB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Gary Isaac <br />CAM-Colorado, LLC <br />August 29, 2008 <br />Page 13 <br />Please revise the cited Volume 1 narrative sections to clarify that the subject vegetation <br />parameter is "vegetation cover", not "herbaceous cover". <br />35. Treatment and identification of species identified as "sub-shrubs" in the Exhibit 5 <br />vegetation survey is a bit confusing. Sub-shrubs comprise a significant component of the <br />Current Annual Production by Lifeform for the various primary vegetation communities <br />(Chart E5-3), but curiously do not appear as a lifeform category in Chart E5-1, Average <br />Cover Summary by Lifeform. Apparently, these species were lumped in with shrubs or <br />fortis (or maybe some in one category and some in the other) in the cover sample. The <br />species Kochia americana is sometimes referred to as a sub-shrub, but is classified as a <br />forb in the cover data, while species such as Ceratoides lanata, Atriplex gardneri, <br />Atriplex corrugata, and Gutierrezia sarothrae are often considered sub-shrubs, but are <br />listed as shrubs in the cover data. C lanata, A gardneri, and A. corrugata were tallied in <br />the woody plant density sample, but G. sarothrae was not. The line between sub-shrub, <br />forb, and shrub is not a distinct one, but clarification is warranted, both to more fully <br />describe the baseline data collected, and to establish the approach for handling these <br />species for purposes of bond release determinations. <br />The Division's 1988 baseline vegetation guideline notes that, in general, half shrubs or <br />suffruticose species (low shrubby perennials with woody bases but herbaceous upper <br />stems) should be included in cover and production, but not woody plant density <br />sampling. Sub-shrub is a term often used interchangeably with half shrub. The guideline <br />lists fringed sage (Artemisia frigida), Louisiana sagewort (Artemisia ludoviciana), <br />winterfat (Ceratoides lanata), snakeweed (Gutierrezia sarothrae), and soapweed (Yucca <br />glauca), as examples of half shrubs. <br />Please amend appropriate sections of Exhibit 5 to describe the species included as sub- <br />shrubs in the production data, and amend appropriate sections of Exhibit 5 and Volume 1 <br />narrative to address how species that may be considered sub-shrubs would be quantified <br />for purposes of revegetation success demonstration (e.g. would they be included in the <br />woody plant density sample to count toward that standard, or would current year's <br />growth be included in the production data to count toward that standard?). Include <br />rationale and authority citation for inclusion of any of the above referenced low growing <br />shrubby species as "woody plants" for purposes of revegetation success demonstration. <br />Division of Wildlife may offer input regarding species that should "count" toward the <br />woody plant density standard, based on forage value or structural utility for wildlife <br />species of concern. <br />Rule 2.04.11 Fish and Wildlife Resources Information <br />An outline description addressing the requirements of Rules 2.04.11 (1) through (4) is presented <br />in Section 2.04.11 of Volume I. Detailed wildlife resource information including appropriate <br />maps documenting seasonal use of the permit area by big game, location of prairie dog towns,
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.