My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-08-12_REVISION - M1980244
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2008-08-12_REVISION - M1980244
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:52:16 PM
Creation date
8/27/2008 3:16:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
8/12/2008
Doc Name
Review of Surface Mine Slope Design and Blasting Vibration Control Plan
From
DRMS-acs
To
DRMS-bmk
Type & Sequence
AM9
Email Name
BMK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />DATE: August 12, 2008 <br />TO: Berhan Keffelew <br />FROM: Allen Sorenson <br />COLORADO <br />D I V I S 10 N OF <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING <br />SAFETY <br />Bill Ritter, Jr. <br />Governor <br />Harris D. Sherman <br />Executive Director <br />Ronald W. Cattany <br />Division Director <br />Natural Resource Trustee <br />RE: Review of Surface Mine Slope Design and Blasting Vibration Control Plan, CrippleCre k and <br />Victor Gold, Cresson Project, Amendment No. AM-09, Permit No. M-1980-244 <br />The Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety (DRMS) engineering staff has reviewed the Surface Mine Slope <br />Design submitted as appendix 5 to volume IV of the AM-09 application. DRMS has also reviewed other potions of <br />AM-09 where mine slope designs are described and the drawings where the mine slopes are depicted. In order for <br />the rock slopes described in AM-09 to be stable, specialized blasting to create final pit walls is required. If the <br />DRMS were to reclaim the mine pits under bond forfeiture, substantial amounts of specialized blasting may be <br />required to stabilize mine slopes that have been subject to production blasting. There are no costs dedicated to this <br />required reclamation blasting in the cost estimates provided by the Applicant. An estimate of these costs must be <br />provided for DRMS review. The estimate must consider the point in the mine plan where the greatest surface area <br />of mine slope would require reclamation blasting, which is not necessarily at the point of full mine out of the pits. <br />If the Applicant wants DRMS to consider reclamation blasting completed concurrently with the mine pits reaching <br />the pit limits, then a plan for concurrent reclamation blasting that will be enforceable under the terms of the permit <br />must be provided. If the Applicant wants the DRMS to consider reclamation blasting to be unnecessary for <br />portions of the pits to be backfilled, then the language in AM-09 allowing essentially total flexibility in the <br />implementation of pit backfilling must be rescinded, and reclamation cost estimates to allow bonding for <br />backfilling, at the point in the mine plan when those costs would be maximized, must be provided. <br />The DRMS has reviewed the blasting vibration information provided in appendix 4 to volume III of AM-09, and <br />the description of blasting vibration controls to be implemented contained in section 5.4.4 of the project description <br />in volume I. Some of the language contained in these two portions of AM-09 could be interpreted as being <br />contradictory. For this and other reasons, the Applicant must commit to the following in order to make necessary <br />blasting vibration controls enforceable by the DRMS. <br />1. The blasting will be done using the following minimum scaled distances: 43.8 for blasting in the North <br />Cresson areas; 35 for all other blasting. <br />2. The distance input factor for the scaled distance equation will be the horizontal distance from the location <br />of any blast to the nearest manmade structure not owned or controlled by the Operator. Such structures <br />shall include the underground workings of the Molly Kathleen tourist mine. <br />3. Peak particle velocity (ppv) caused by blasting vibration measured at any of the monitoring locations <br />approved by the DRMS in excess of 0.5 inches per second (ips) shall be reported to the DRMS as soon as <br />possible after the Operator has knowledge of such measurements. Measurements from any two blasting <br />events that exceed 0.5 ips, wherefore neither event has the cause of the elevated ppv been investigated and <br />results accepted by DRMS, shall trigger complete cessation of blasting operations until authorization to <br />continue is granted by DRMS. <br />Office of Office of <br />Mined Land Reclamation- Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.