My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-08-25_REVISION - M1980244 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2008-08-25_REVISION - M1980244 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:52:17 PM
Creation date
8/27/2008 3:16:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
8/25/2008
Doc Name
PAR-Fax
From
DRMS
To
CC&V
Type & Sequence
AM9
Email Name
BMK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
suggested that the overall design of the cover configuration be reviewed and <br />consideration be given to placing a clayey sand/gravel layer on top of the <br />compacted clay (maybe 1.5 to 2 feet thick) before placing the topsoil. Such a <br />layer will further protect the integrity of the compacted clay layer and thereby <br />reduce the infiltration in the long-term. <br />5. Conclusions <br />I appreciate the opportunity to review portions of the permit for the Cresson <br />project. Phase 5 of the VLF will increase the footprint as well as the height of the <br />heap. Based on my review of the selected topics above I provide the following <br />conclusions: <br />• The materials that I reviewed and discussed with Adrian Brown and John <br />Lupo clearly indicates the high level of professionalism and dedication of <br />the designers. This is only possible with the ongoing support and <br />encouragement of CC&V. It is clear that the high standards set by CC&V <br />and the State of Colorado during the initial stages of the Cresson VLF <br />design has been maintained and that the commitments to environmental <br />protection have not changed. <br />• The Phase 5 VLF design follows similar approaches as before and it is a <br />seamless extension of the previous Phases. There was a concern <br />expressed about the final heap height of 800 feet. While this is a <br />significant heap height, my review shows that the design is based on an <br />exhaustive set of evaluations that considered liner integrity and leachate <br />collection. I conclude that the 800 feet high heap can be constructed and <br />operated with an acceptable margin of safety. <br />• The dynamic water balance is an improvement over the static water <br />balances previously presented for the Cresson project as it allows for the <br />inclusion of dynamic relationships between the various components. It <br />also allows the inclusion of flexible operating conditions. <br />• The design of the East Cresson overburden storage facility takes <br />advantage of the present site conditions and its location on the Cripple <br />Creek Diatreme. The design follows a very sound concept. I would <br />suggest a rethink of the cover system to provide further reliability against <br />potential erosion and cracking. It is suggested that the compacted clay <br />layer be covered by 1.5 to 2 feet of clayey materials to better protect this <br />layer. <br />Thank you for the opportunity to complete this review. Please contact me if there <br />are any questions or if I can provide further clarification. <br />Sincerely, <br />Dirk van Zyl, P.E., Ph.D. <br />Consultant <br />7
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.