My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-08-25_REVISION - M1980244 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2008-08-25_REVISION - M1980244 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:52:17 PM
Creation date
8/27/2008 3:16:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
8/25/2008
Doc Name
PAR-Fax
From
DRMS
To
CC&V
Type & Sequence
AM9
Email Name
BMK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Based on the reported test results (some of these results were verbally <br />reported by John Lupo) the geomembrane performed well until a normal <br />stress equivalent to a height of 1,020 feet, at an equivalent height of <br />1,040 feet some punctures were observed and there was significant <br />particle crushing. The height of 800 feet therefore allows a significant <br />safety margin. <br />An important aspect of the puncturing behavior of the liner is the <br />condition of the foundation underlying the compacted clay liner. To <br />prevent puncturing it is essential to have a firm foundation that will not <br />settle. The whole pad area of the VLF is underlain by firm materials so <br />that foundation settlement is not an issue. <br />One other aspect that was evaluated during the review is the slope of the <br />foundation in the area where the heap height is 800 feet. If the slope is <br />steep then small movements may occur along the liner interface as a <br />result of the compression of heap materials. In the worst case such small <br />movements may result in striations on the geomembrane and under the <br />best case the material will slide along the interface. The latter is the most <br />probable scenario as it is similar to what happens in shearbox tests at <br />high normal stresses. <br />Considering the isopach information on Figure 3 of the AMEC report as <br />well as the foundation grading of the VLF (refer to Dwg 4 of the Phase IV <br />Design by Golder Associates, April 2000), the high heap heights will be <br />directly above areas where the slope of the foundation was either almost <br />flat or in the order of 3.5:1. The effects of the foundation slope are <br />therefore not of any concern to the integrity of the geomembrane liner <br />under the high heap. <br />Based on my review and discussions I am confident that the equivalent <br />load posed by the proposed 800 feet high heap will not adversely effect <br />the composite liner system of the VLF. <br />b. Leachate Pipe System <br />The leachate pipe collection system must remain operational under high <br />heap heights to prevent the development of high fluid heads on the liner <br />system that may increase the amount of leakage through potential liner <br />imperfections. Experience shows that after about 20 percent strain the <br />leachate collection pipes can deform into a "binocular" shape. The analysis <br />presented in Appendix C.3 of the AMEC report indicates that all the pipes <br />will have sufficient capacity under the designed heap heights. It is <br />expected that some of these pipes will be deformed into binocular shapes. <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.