My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-08-25_REVISION - M1980244
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2008-08-25_REVISION - M1980244
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:52:17 PM
Creation date
8/27/2008 3:15:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
8/25/2008
Doc Name
Preliminary Adequacy Review Comments
From
DRMS
To
CC&V
Type & Sequence
AM9
Email Name
BMK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />August 25, 2008, <br />COLORADO <br />D IV IS I ON OF <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING <br />SAFETY <br />Bill Ritter, Jr. <br />Governor <br />Harris Sherman Gary Goodrich Executive e Director <br />Manager Environmental Resources Ronald W. Cattany <br />Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining. Co. Division Director <br />P.O. Box 191 Natural Resource Trustee <br />Victor, Colorado 80860 <br />RE: Cresson Project; DRMS Permit # M-1980-244; Amendment-09; Preliminary Adequacy Review <br />Comments <br />Dear Mr. Goodrich: <br />The Division of Reclamation Mining and Safety has reviewed your Amendment # 9 (AM-09) application, <br />also referred to as Mine Extension Application, and has the following comments. <br />General Comments <br />A) The application for the most part appears to follow closely the previously approved Amendment # <br />8 application. It refers to Amendment # 8 approved submittals to explain most of the narrative. As <br />such, the Division assumes that the Amendment # 8 volumes, as submitted to the DRMS and the <br />County Clerks and Recorder's Office in March 2000, were also available for the public to refer to in <br />the event there were questions about what was approved in Amendment # 8. Without the <br />Amendment # 8 material, and knowing what was approved in August 2000 by the Mined Land <br />Reclamation Board over objections, it would be difficult if not impossible for a reader to know <br />exactly what was approved and contrast the difference between this proposal and what was already <br />approved. Did CC&V provide additional copies of Amendment # 8 volumes with Amendment 9 <br />volumes to the County Clerks and Recorder's Office? <br />Only small changes to the total affected area are proposed under this amendment (4184 to 4199). <br />The total permit acreage of 5,847, as approved under AM # 8, still remains in effect. However, the <br />Division cari t emphasize enough the need to have Amendment # 8 volumes available to the public <br />since this amendment relies heavily on what is already approved under that amendment. <br />B) The current amendment application proposes the following changes: <br />1) Minor permit boundary changes in the Grassy Valley area. <br />2) Increase the overall affected areas by adding mining areas associated with the main Cresson, <br />Wild Horse and North Cresson. <br />3) Increase the East and Squaw Gulch overburden areas. <br />4) Build a new valley leach facility in the already affected area in Arequa Gulch. <br />Office of 1 Office of <br />Mined Land Reclamation Denver • Grand Junction • Durango ArtivP anrd InartivP Minpc
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.