My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-08-13_REVISION - C1981013 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981013
>
2008-08-13_REVISION - C1981013 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:35:29 PM
Creation date
8/27/2008 11:37:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
8/13/2008
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance for SL6
From
DRMS
To
New Elk Coal Company
Type & Sequence
SL6
Email Name
KAG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
reference area production by a wide margin. In the final bond release report, the operator <br />presented two separate t-test demonstrations for the 2005 rangeland production data. The <br />first test was a two sample reverse null t-test, based on the sample size of 90 in the <br />reclaimed area and reference area (each uq adrat treated as an independent observation). <br />The second test was a two sample reverse null t-test, based on a sample size of 15 in the <br />reclaimed area and reference area (each transect treated as an independent observation). <br />Both tests are based on "corrected" quadrat data (undesirable component removed from <br />the data from each quadrat prior to calculation of sample statistics). Both tests conclude <br />that the reclaimed area production exceeds the reference area production; therefore, the <br />Division accepts the data as a valid demonstration of success. <br />Production data in 2006 was collected using thirty randomly located 0.5 m2 plots. Sample <br />adequacy was not achieved using the standard formula for any of the four sampling units. <br />As allowed by Rule 4.15.11 (2)(c), a reverse null approach was used. In both cases, the <br />null hypothesis of equality was rejected; the alternative hypothesis (reference area mean <br />less than reclaim area mean) was accepted. This was a statistical confirmation of what <br />was intuitively obvious from the data. The t-tests demonstrated that the reclaimed area <br />sample means in both the pastureland and the rangeland exceed their respective <br />reference area sample means at the 90% level of statistical confidence, pursuant to Rule <br />4.15.11(2)(c). Production is considered successful for the reclaimed pasture and the <br />reclaimed rangeland. <br />Three undesirable species were encountered in the revegetation sampling effort. <br />Canadian thistle is listed on the State's B list of noxious species and field bindweed is on <br />the State's C list. Neither one of these species is listed on the Las Animas County noxious <br />weed list. The operator also encountered a large crop of yellow sweetclover during 2005 in <br />the reclaimed rangeland <br />area. The operator <br />subtracted out the cover <br />value for these undesirable <br />species in excess of 10% <br />relative cover as suggested <br />by the Division's 1995 bond <br />release guideline <br />It should also be noted that <br />the summer of 2006 was <br />extremely dry in Las <br />Animas County. The <br />vegetation sampling effort <br />was undertaken during this <br />period. The low 2006 cover <br />and production sampling <br />results reflect the lack of <br />moisture. <br /> <br />Arcadis representatives sampling vegetation, Golden Eagle Mine
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.