My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-08-13_REVISION - C1981013 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981013
>
2008-08-13_REVISION - C1981013 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:35:29 PM
Creation date
8/27/2008 11:37:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
8/13/2008
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance for SL6
From
DRMS
To
New Elk Coal Company
Type & Sequence
SL6
Email Name
KAG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Technical Revision No. 49 was approved in October 1998 to remove sediment pond 3 <br />and pond 4 after a demonstration that the area had been stabilized and was not <br />producing sediment in excess of adjacent un-mined areas. <br />In June 2001, Technical Revision No. 52 (TR-52) was approved to eliminate water <br />monitoring of surface water sites since the mine no longer discharged water to the <br />surface system via sediment ponds or mine water discharge. The mine has no effect or <br />contribution that would cause any exceedance of the receiving stream standards for the <br />Middle Fork of the Purgatoire River. TR-52 also increased the monitoring frequency of <br />the sites monitoring the mine flooding to better characterize the rate and quality of the <br />ground water entering the abandoned mine workings. <br />Technical Revision No. 53 was approved in June 2002 and the operator adequately <br />demonstrated that a ground water point of compliance was not necessary for the <br />alluvial ground water of the Purgatoire River adjacent to the reclaimed mine area. In a <br />reclaimed state, the chance that the mine could impact the alluvial water quality is <br />negligible. Monitoring data supports this conclusion as demonstrated by a comparison <br />of data collected from the upstream and downstream alluvial wells PAW-5 and PAW-9, <br />respectively. <br />In July 2004 Technical Revision No. 54 reduced water sampling of the workings to an <br />annual sample and reduced measurements in deep wells to water level only. This <br />revision also terminated spring and seep monitoring requirements entirely. Monitoring <br />during the post-subsidence period indicated no impact to springs or seeps. No springs <br />or seeps exist over the Golden Eagle mine workings. <br />The applicant has successfully demonstrated through monitoring and revision to the <br />hydrologic monitoring program over the bond liability time period that mining has not <br />negatively impacted the surface or ground water system outside the permit area. All <br />remaining water monitoring not previously approved for termination is proposed to <br />cease in conjunction with this proposed decision. Through permitting actions during the <br />bond liability period the applicant has demonstrated no impact to springs, seeps, <br />surface water, alluvial water, or deep bedrock water quality. No pollution of surface or <br />ground water has occurred or is expected to occur as a result of mining and <br />reclamation. Ground water is entering the mine workings as predicted following the <br />cessation of mining and the quality of that water is similar to water discharged during <br />the operational period. Measurements in deep wells surrounding the mined area show <br />stable or recovering water levels. The mine did not directly undermine and subside the <br />alluvial valley floor of the Purgatoire River and the absence of impacts to surface and <br />alluvial ground water supports the conclusion that the function and capacity of the <br />alluvial valley floor has been protected. <br />Support of the Post Mining Land Use <br />All hydrologic and revegetation data collected indicates that the post-mining land uses <br />of rangeland and pastureland have been successfully achieved. Periodic inspection by <br />the Division has documented use of the reclaimed area by large mammals such as elk
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.