Laserfiche WebLink
r ^, <br />Ms. Kimberly K. Frick, P.G. <br />August 4, 2008 <br />Page 5 of 5 <br />13. The decision of the state engineer shall have no precedential or evidentiary <br />force, shall not create any presumptions, shift the burden of proof, or serve as a <br />defense in any water court case or any other legal action that may be initiated <br />concerning the substitute water supply plan. This decision shall not bind the <br />State Engineer to act in a similar manner in any other applications involving other <br />plans or in any proposed renewal of this plan, and shall not imply concurrence <br />with any findings of fact or conclusions of law contained herein, or with the <br />engineering methodologies used by the Applicant. <br />Should you have any questions, please contact Joanna Williams of this office or <br />Mr. Dave Nettles of our Division office in Greeley at (970) 352-0742. <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />Kevin G. Rein, P.E. <br />Chief of Water Supply <br />Attachments: Table 1 <br />KGR/JMW <br />cc: Dave Nettles, Assistant Division Engineer <br />George Varra, District 3 Water Commissioner <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety