Laserfiche WebLink
>>> <savageandsavage@earthlink.net> 7/18/2008 9:00 AM >>> <br />Tom, <br />I received your letter yesterday, and if I read it correctly, the Division is contending <br />that the post-mining land use of industrial, commercial, residential, and recreation has <br />not been implemented at the Carbon Junction Mine. I must point out that the Division <br />earlier stated in findings documents that the post-mining land use had been implemented, <br />through the approval of residential platting, the operation of the gravel pit, and the <br />establishement of the public trails for La Plata County on the boundaries of the permit <br />area. If the Division is now asserting otherwise, we have a serious problem. This is one <br />reason I requested that you schedule a meeting with staff and administrators in my <br />response to the PAR for the renewal. I am currently consulting with Oakridge Energy <br />regarding a further response. <br />Mike Savage <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: "Kaldenbach, Tom" <br />Sent: Jul 15, 2008 8:29 AM <br />To: savageandsavage@earthlink <br />Subject: Carbon Junction Mine <br />Mike, <br />net <br />(C1992080), Minor Revision 6 <br />Yesterday I sent a letter to you requesting that the vegetation study in MR-6 be re- <br />submitted without the Phase III bond release text, as the site will be eligible for Phase <br />III when the residential postmining land use is implemented, which does not appear to be <br />something that will happen soon. <br />We may need to discuss the timeframe of implementing the residential postmining land use, <br />and what activity will constitute implementation. <br />Please request an extension of the review time for MR-6. <br />Tom <br />2