My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-08-08_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2008086
>
2008-08-08_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:35:19 PM
Creation date
8/11/2008 9:01:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2008086
IBM Index Class Name
APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE
Doc Date
8/8/2008
Doc Name
Comment Letter
From
Fish and Wildlife Service
To
DRMS
Email Name
MPB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT DRAFT <br />DRAFT <br />abundant prey populations. Fertilization and/or watering programs may be <br />necessary to successfully establish the vegetation. Need references. <br />2. If the proposed project and effects thereof are long term or permanent, then upfront <br />habitat acquisition, development, and/or improvement to mitigate for impacted areas <br />should be considered. The amount and type of mitigation should be based on losses in <br />habitat value. Onsite, in-kind mitigation is preferred, however, offsite and/or out-of-kind <br />mitigation may be considered if the resulting benefits to raptor populations offset the <br />predetermined losses for the project area. <br />STEP 3 <br />Post-project monitoring to determine the effectiveness of habitat mitigation measures on raptor <br />populations should be an integral component of the mitigation plan. Publishing data and results <br />should also be considered to develop information regarding raptor populations and responses to <br />human activities and developments. <br />NEST AND ROOST PROTECT/ON <br />General Guidelines <br />Raptors typically demonstrate a high degree of fidelity to nesting locations. Successful habitat <br />management should be complemented by efforts to attain natural or predevelopment nesting <br />success of local raptor populations and protection of winter roosting activities. Spatial and <br />seasonal buffer zones have regularly been used to protect individual nest sites/territories to <br />ensure successful breeding and to maintain high use areas by raptors. <br />No temporary or permanent surface occupancy occur within species-specific spatial and <br />seasonal buffer zones. <br />Coordination with appropriate Service, State wildlife resources management agency, and/or land <br />management agency biologists should occur when implementing nest/roost site protective <br />measures to ensure that the intent of these guidelines and associated State and Federal <br />regulations are realized. <br />Buffer zones are defined as seasonal or spatial areas of inactivity in association with individual <br />nests or nesting territories. Spatial buffers are defined as radii from known occupied and <br />unoccupied nest sites. Seasonal buffers are restrictions on the times when human activities <br />should be allowed to occur within the spatial buffers. <br />Raptor nesting information and buffer recommendations provided in these guidelines were <br />developed following review of pertinent literature and coordination with knowledgeable wildlife <br />professionals (Call 1979, Jones 1979, Fitzner 1980, Wood 1980, Dubois 1984, USDI Fish and <br />Wildl. Serv. 1984, White and Thurow 1985, Palmer 1988, Johnsgard 1988, Johnsgard 1990, <br />16
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.