My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-08-08_REVISION - M1973007SG
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1973007
>
2008-08-08_REVISION - M1973007SG
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:39:01 PM
Creation date
8/8/2008 1:10:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1973007SG
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
8/8/2008
Doc Name
Response to Adequacy Letter
From
SES
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM3
Email Name
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 <br />Aug 8, 2008 <br />Daniels Sand Pit #2 <br />moving forward, but with the weak economy it is conceivable that this <br />construction will need to be delayed for lack of funds. Of course, those decisions <br />are not in the hands of Continental Materials. So, with the changes in the end use it <br />is even more important to have an alternate revegetation plan in place in the event <br />there are prolonged delays in the highway construction. <br />Response - Reclamation: In our opinion, the reclamation for this area probably needs to be divided into two <br />parts. First, is temporary reclamation to fill the time gap between the present and <br />the start of highway construction. Second, is more permanent reclamation in the <br />event the highway construction is cancelled for some reason. Although the latter is <br />not likely, it is always a possibility, no matter how small. <br />Reclamation of Affected Land in Highway Corridor <br />Two situations could exist with regard to this land. On the one hand, during the time between <br />the present and the initiation of the highway construction any affected land in this corridor needs to <br />have some vegetation cover to mainly reduce blowing sand and soil particles. The second situation <br />might arise if the highway construction does not occur. Although this is unlikely, it is a possibility <br />and needs to be accounted for. <br />Dealing with the second case would be fairly simple. Any affected land that does not have <br />sufficient soil to establish a permanent, long-lasting vegetation cover would be topsoiled in <br />accordance with the same specifications as the slopes above and below the Fountain Mutual Ditch <br />corridor. Those areas, as well as any other affected lands that do have adequate soil coverage, would <br />be planted with the same seed mixture that is to be used on the slopes around the north end of the <br />pit. <br />In the first situation, where the land sits idle while waiting for the construction to begin, soil will <br />not be placed on the affected land as any removed soil is already stockpiled elsewhere for use in the <br />pit reclamation. During the fall or winter of 2008/2009, this land will be loosened by discing or other <br />appropriate means to remove any compaction and will be planted with the following seed mixture. <br />The seeding rate is for drill seeding. <br />Species Rate # PLS/acre) <br />Regreen 10 (should be planted at least an inch deep) <br />Sand Bluestein 7 (plant along with Regreen) <br />Ranger Alfalfa 1 (can be hand broadcast either before drilling but after <br />loosening soil, or after drilling) <br />In this mixture, the Regreen provides quick cover in the next growing season and a nurse crop <br />for the bluestem, and the alfalfa aids in the improvement of nitrogen in the sandy soil. As there is <br />probably no more than an acre or so of land to be seeded, this is an inexpensive, effective treatment <br />to establish some vegetation. <br />Item C. - Growth medium: A concern is expressed over the use of materials from elsewhere in the operation <br />or materials donated and imported into the site for reclaiming the pit floor. <br />Response: In the long history of this site, a fair amount of mining was done prior to requirements for <br />salvaging topsoil became the law. Thus, there could be some deficiency in the amount of available <br />soil to place an adequate depth over all areas that will be revegetated. Clearly, the priority for <br />topsoiling are the slopes as those will be in most need of a good growth medium. The lowest <br />priority is the pit bottom which will be essentially level and tends to revegetate fairly easily with
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.