Laserfiche WebLink
rangeland for the proposed additional acreage is accurate and not misleading. Additionally, <br />although the original notice that was sent out with the incorrect location information contained this <br />information related to rangeland, the objector did not mention this issue at the time of the original <br />comments. The Division believes that if the objector had concerns related to this information, it <br />should have been addressed in the original comment letter. <br />Division Comment <br />The Division believes that the Applicant has adequately addressed this issue. <br />III. DIVISION RECOMMENDATION <br />It is the Division's determination that the Applicant has fulfilled all of the minimum requirements for <br />approval of the proposed permit amendment for the Bayfield Pit No. I,File M-1987-038. Therefore <br />the Division recommends approval of the permit amendment.