My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-06-20_REVISION - C1980007
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2008-06-20_REVISION - C1980007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:33:23 PM
Creation date
6/23/2008 9:47:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
6/20/2008
Doc Name
Request of Rocky Mountain Clean Air Action for Formal Hearing on the Proposed Decision
From
EarthJustice
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR111
Email Name
TAK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Request for Hearing on TR-11 1 for the West Elk Mine (Permit No. C-1980-0007) Page 7 <br />June 20, 2008 <br />B. If the Methane Cannot Be Captured, DRMS Should Require the Mine <br />to Flare the Methane. <br />If DRMS concludes that it cannot mandate capture, DRMS should require the Mine to <br />flare vented methane. Although CO2 resulting from the combustion of fossil fuels is often cited <br />as the leading cause of global warming pollution, release of raw methane has a more than <br />twenty-fold greater impact on the climate. The Forest Service's EIS recognizes that "flaring may <br />be used to reduce green house gas emissions." Exh. 1 at 44. Further, flaring of methane could <br />occur safely. According to an October 26, 2007 e-mail from Erik Sherer, a mining engineer with <br />the Division of Safety at the MSHA: <br />There is a long and safe history of flaring waste gas and volatile hydrocarbons in <br />the petroleum and chemical industries. MSHA would approve flaring of <br />methane drainage if appropriate protections are incorporated into the <br />flaring system. <br />See email of Hubert E. Sherer, MSHA to Liane Madsen, USFS, et al. (Oct. 26, 2007 3:12 PM), <br />included in Exh. 8 (emphasis added). Additionally, in a November 1, 2007 e-mail, Mr. Sherer <br />responded to the EPA's comments suggesting that the Mine flare methane. Mr. Sherer stated: <br />MSHA would approve a methane flaring system that incorporates adequate <br />protections to prevent a flame or explosion from propagating to the coal Mine.... <br />MSHA has no regulation or policy that prohibits the flaring of methane.... <br />MSHA has reviewed the EPA flare system and concurs that this is an acceptable <br />method for flaring methane produced from coal Mine degas holes. However, any <br />proposed flare system would have to be designed for Mine-specific conditions <br />(flow rates, gas concentrations, etc.) and must be approved in the ventilation plan. <br />See email of Hubert E. Sherer, MSHA to Liane Mattson, USFS, et al. (Nov. 1, 2007 4:31 AM), <br />included in Exh. 8.1 ° <br />These communications demonstrate that no regulatory hurdles exist to methane flaring. <br />Although a flare system would have to be designed for mine-specific conditions, nothing from <br />the MSHA indicates that this alternative is unreasonable or speculative. Further, methane flaring <br />is used safely at numerous mines around the world, and is already in use in the Mine's winter <br />heating system. See Exh. 2 (Appeal) at 14-16. <br />10 While another MSHA official subsequently disagreed with Mr. Sherer, that official's <br />statements are entirely undermined by the fact that flaring is conducted routinely at a number of <br />coal mines around the world. See Exh. 2 at 14-16.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.