My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-06-20_REVISION - C1980007
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2008-06-20_REVISION - C1980007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:33:23 PM
Creation date
6/23/2008 9:47:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
6/20/2008
Doc Name
Request of Rocky Mountain Clean Air Action for Formal Hearing on the Proposed Decision
From
EarthJustice
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR111
Email Name
TAK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
by the same person or persons under common control, thus contravening a separate requirement <br />of the mobile source definition. 26 <br />The Forest Service erred in authorizing the Project without ensuring compliance with the <br />Clean Air Act. The Act states that federal agencies shall "comply with all Federal, State, <br />interstate, and local requirements, administrative authority, and process and sanctions respecting <br />the control and abatement of air pollution in the same manner, and to the same extent as any <br />nongovernmental entity." 42 U.S.C. § 7418(a). This applies "to the exercise of any Federal ... <br />administrative authority." Id. The Forest Service thus must not authorize Mountain Coal <br />Company to proceed with the Project until Mountain Coal obtains the requisite PSD permit with <br />regard to its methane emissions from the West Elk Mine and meets BACT requirements. <br />REQUEST FOR RELIEF <br />Based on the foregoing Statement of Reasons, Appellants hereby request the following <br />relief: <br />The Regional Forester must withdraw the Record of Decision ("ROD") approving <br />the E Seam Methane Drainage Wells Project. <br />If the Forest Service intends to proceed with the E Seam Methane Drainage Wells <br />Project, it must prepare NEPA documentation (including opportunities for public <br />involvement and appeal) that complies fully with NEPA, the Clean Air Act, and <br />the Administrative Procedure Act, and that addresses all of the issues raised in <br />this appeal. <br />Any decision on this appeal must include a full response to each issue raised in <br />the Statement of Reasons. <br />4. The Regional Forester must direct Forest Supervisor Charles S. Richmond to <br />refrain from committing any further agency resources to implementing the <br />ze This same defect vitiates the entire Forest Service analysis of air quality impacts. In <br />the Project FEIS, the Forest Service claims that, across the board, "Due to the nature of the <br />project (i.e., mobile equipment), no specific permit requirements apply to gaseous emissions." <br />Project FEIS at 58. That premise is flatly wrong. <br />APPEAL OF E SEAM METHANE DRAINAGE WELLS PROJECT, APRIL 28, 2008 PAGE 40
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.