My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-06-20_REVISION - C1980007
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2008-06-20_REVISION - C1980007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:33:23 PM
Creation date
6/23/2008 9:47:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
6/20/2008
Doc Name
Request of Rocky Mountain Clean Air Action for Formal Hearing on the Proposed Decision
From
EarthJustice
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR111
Email Name
TAK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
produces no. benefit to the government other than coal revenue, it is apparent that any positive <br />result from capturing of the methane, including reducing greenhouse gas impacts or improving <br />safety, is beneficial. The Forest Service acknowledges, on the eighth page of their responses to <br />EPA comments, that MCC is currently using some of ventilated methane to run heaters in the <br />Sylvester Gulch shaft. See Exh. 4 at fax page 17 of 32. Apparently such a use, that allows the <br />operator to continue operations in sub-freezing weather, provides a benefit to the government or <br />it would otherwise be illegal. The only apparent benefit to the government comes from increased <br />coal revenues from continued mine operation. The same consideration should be given to <br />capturing methane, which would allow the mine to continue operations while mitigating its <br />global warming impacts. <br />b. Economic Concerns Do Not Render Capture an Infeasible <br />Alternative. <br />While methane capture may cost money, there can be no doubt that capture can be <br />economically performed, since it is ongoing at numerous mines in the U.S. and around the world. <br />As noted above, methane vented at the Aberdeen mine was captured methane for sale and use. <br />Outside investors subsidized that methane capture to reap carbon credits, a factor the Forest <br />Service ignores in its analysis. See A. Best, Mining New Carbon Offset Market, Pique <br />Newsmagazine (Mar. 26, 2008), attached as Exh. 27 and available at <br />www.piquenewsmagazine.com/pique/index.php?content=Coal+bed+methane+1513 (last viewed <br />Apr. 23, 2008). Jim Walter Resources has been capturing coal mine methane from its Alabama <br />mines since 1979 through its Black Warrior Methane subsidiary. These facilities capture <br />methane from gob wells. Jim Walter Resources, Inc., webpage, <br />wwwjimwalterresources.com/Subs.html, attached as Exh. 28 (last viewed Apr. 23, 2008). In <br />fact, today a Canadian energy company, Biothermica, announced that it had obtained MSFIA <br />APPEAL OF E SEAM METHANE DRAINAGE WELLS PROJECT, APRIL 28, 2008 PAGE 27
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.