My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-06-20_REVISION - C1980007
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2008-06-20_REVISION - C1980007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:33:23 PM
Creation date
6/23/2008 9:47:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
6/20/2008
Doc Name
Request of Rocky Mountain Clean Air Action for Formal Hearing on the Proposed Decision
From
EarthJustice
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR111
Email Name
TAK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Request for Hearing on TR-I I 1 for the West Elk Mine (Permit No. C-1980-0007) Page 3 <br />June 20, 2008 <br />II. The Proposed Technical Revision Represents Analysis of Only One Element of a <br />Larger Project. <br />As described above, TR-l 11 is the first element of a larger methane drainage project <br />which is also being separately considered by DRMS under Technical Revision 112 (TR-1 12) to <br />the Mine permit. This is a distinction of separate projects on paper only; the methane drainage <br />project has been conceived of, and analyzed by the Forest Service as an, integrated whole. By <br />segregating the project into two Technical Revisions, DRMS has compromised the public's - <br />and its own - ability to comprehensively analyze and comment on the project. <br />III. The Methane Drainage Wells Will Be a Significant Source of Colorado Greenhouse <br />Gas Emissions. <br />The drainage wells to be authorized would release large quantities of methane from the <br />gob produced from the longwall operations. Methane is one of the most potent greenhouse gases <br />when released to the atmosphere uncombusted. <br />The "harms associated with climate change are serious and well recognized." <br />Massachusetts v. EPA, 127 S. Ct. 1438, 1455 (2007). According to Governor Bill Ritter: <br />Scientists tell us that to head off catastrophic disruptions to our environment and <br />society by the second half of this century-when our children and grandchildren <br />will be running this state-we must slash greenhouse gas emissions by 80 percent <br />below 2005 levels by 2050. <br />Governor Bill Ritter Jr., Colorado Climate Action Plan: A Strategy to Address Global Warming <br />(Nov. 2007) at 10, attached as Exh. 3. Thus, even a small increase in greenhouse gas emissions <br />in Colorado is significant because it makes it more difficult for the State to achieve the Action <br />Plan's ambitious goals. See also Executive Order D 004 08, "Reducing Greenhouse Gas <br />Emissions in Colorado" (April 22, 2008) at 1 (calling for, among other things, a 20% reduction <br />in greenhouse gases below 2005 levels by 2020 and an 80% reduction below 2005 levels by <br />2050, and stating that "Many sectors of Colorado's economy, including agriculture, recreation, <br />skiing, and tourism, could experience significant changes and impacts if emissions are not <br />reduced."), attached as Exh. 4. <br />In its environmental impact statement evaluating the surface impacts of the West Elk <br />Mine expansion and the overall methane drainage project, the U.S Forest Service wrote that <br />"[m]ethane is over 20 times more effective in trapping heat in the atmosphere than CO2 over a <br />100-year period." Exh. 1 (West Elk Final EIS) at 60. It also calculated that the methane <br />drainage project would release 7,000,000 cubic feet of methane daily, and contribute the <br />equivalent of 960,960 to 1,131,200 metric tons of CO2 into the atmosphere annually. Id. <br />Global warming presents a threat to fish, wildlife, and other environmental and social <br />values, and, consequently, to the interests of those seeking a hearing. See IPCC's Contribution
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.